|
Sr. No.
|
Rank
|
Name
|
City
|
Total
|
1st Pref
|
2nd Pref
|
|
1
|
25
|
Shruti Shah
|
Mumbai
|
711
|
516
|
195
|
|
2
|
5
|
Shardul Shah
|
Mumbai
|
1327
|
1166
|
161
|
|
3
|
8
|
Dhiraj Khandelwal
|
Mumbai
|
1225
|
1069
|
156
|
|
4
|
24
|
Vandana Dodhia
|
Mumbai
|
721
|
574
|
147
|
|
5
|
35
|
Ashok Chand Jain
|
Mumbai
|
512
|
390
|
122
|
|
6
|
6
|
Sunil Patodia
|
Mumbai
|
1322
|
1205
|
117
|
|
7
|
11
|
Vishnu Kumar Agarwal
|
Mumbai
|
1028
|
914
|
114
|
|
8
|
4
|
Mangesh Kinare
|
Mumbai
|
1400
|
1290
|
110
|
|
9
|
16
|
Anil Bhandari Satyanarayan
|
Mumbai
|
877
|
772
|
105
|
|
10
|
26
|
Sandeep Jain
|
Mumbai
|
680
|
596
|
84
|
|
11
|
28
|
Mahendra Mehta
|
Mumbai
|
653
|
570
|
83
|
|
12
|
29
|
Jayesh Kala
|
Mumbai
|
649
|
568
|
81
|
|
13
|
15
|
Neel Majithia
|
Mumbai
|
887
|
816
|
71
|
|
14
|
34
|
Raj Jagetia
|
Mumbai
|
525
|
476
|
49
|
|
15
|
22
|
Ramesha Shetty
|
Mumbai
|
756
|
717
|
39
|
23 December 2012
Mumbai Candidates: Who is eating into your second preference Votes?
Mumbai candidates, who is eating your second preference votes? See the table below. The candidates who are eating the maximum second preference votes are those, who are sure to win and already in green since beginning. Rest of them are sure to loose. Ashok Jain already eliminated and Raj Jagetiya will follow
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
*1. What is Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme (PMGKDS), 2016?* Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme (PMGKDS), 2016 is a sche...
-
The ICAI elections are back. Keep watch this page for all the updates on this election. You can bookmark this. To begin with, the first issu...
-
Elections are about 'conventional wisdoms', which hold true like theorems most times... but it is the exceptions that prove the rule...
What happens to the ballot of a candidate who is in the process of elimination which contains
ReplyDeletea) 2nd preference to candidates who are already eliminated;
b) 2nd preference to a candidate excess of who have already been allocated
i)Does the third preference is considered immediately or is kept in abeyance?
In such cases its go to the next live candidate. If none, then exhaust. In case of excess, it is further distributed on base of next preference.
ReplyDeleteYou mean to say the third preference is choosen from that ballot paper as the second preference candidate is no more alive to receive.
ReplyDeleteThat's correct.
ReplyDelete