Rank
|
Sr No.
|
Name
|
City
|
1st Pref
|
Dist of Excess of 4-Jay
|
Total After Excess
|
1
|
4
|
CHHAIRA JAY AJIT
|
SURAT
|
3829
|
0
|
3829
|
2
|
5
|
CHHAJED PRAFULLA PREMSUKH
|
MUMBAI
|
3787
|
0
|
3787
|
3
|
9
|
JAMBUSARIA NIHAR NIRANJAN
|
MUMBAI
|
3442
|
27.83
|
3470
|
4
|
18
|
TALATI ANIKET SUNIL
|
AHMEDABAD
|
2988
|
86.13
|
3074
|
5
|
13
|
KHANDELWAL DHEERAJ KUMAR
|
MUMBAI
|
2735
|
31.24
|
2766
|
6
|
14
|
KHANDELWAL PURUSHOTTAMLAL HUKAMICHAND
|
AHMEDABAD
|
2559
|
33
|
2592
|
7
|
8
|
HEGDE NANDKISHORE CHIDAMBER
|
MUMBAI
|
2477
|
5.72
|
2483
|
8
|
12
|
KABRA DURGESH KUMAR
|
MUMBAI
|
2425
|
21.23
|
2446
|
9
|
3
|
BHANDARI ANIL SATYANARAYAN
|
MUMBAI
|
2365
|
49.28
|
2414
|
10
|
6
|
CHITALE CHANDRASHEKHAR VASANT
|
PUNE
|
2373
|
3.85
|
2377
|
11
|
15
|
KINARE MANGESH PANDURANG
|
THANE
|
2268
|
2.31
|
2270
|
12
|
11
|
JOSHI SHRINIWAS YESHWANT
|
MUMBAI
|
2225
|
2.53
|
2228
|
13
|
7
|
GHIA TARUN JAMNADAS
|
MUMBAI
|
2131
|
43.67
|
2175
|
14
|
1
|
ADUKIA RAJKUMAR SATYANARAYAN
|
MUMBAI
|
1823
|
26.62
|
1850
|
15
|
17
|
SHAH SHRUTI JAYESH
|
MUMBAI
|
1329
|
27.39
|
1356
|
16
|
10
|
JOSHI SARVESH NANDLAL
|
PUNE
|
930
|
3.08
|
933
|
17
|
2
|
BANERJEE ROBIN
|
MUMBAI
|
892
|
6.27
|
898
|
18
|
16
|
PAWAR SANJAY NARAYAN
|
PUNE
|
747
|
1.32
|
748
|
21 December 2018
CC: Status After Excess distribution of Jay Chhaira
After Elimination of Jay Chhaira
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Drafts of tax accounting standard on construction contracts, government grants issued The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has invited c...
-
After the ICAI regional council and central council elections , there is an anxious waiting period for resul...
-
Here is the final list of candidates won from WIRC for Central Council: Sr. No. Name of Candidate 1 CA. Adukia Rajkumar Satyanarayan 2 CA...
Sir elimination means..its distribution na
ReplyDeleteyes ..how an elimination its qualified or still all preference to be counted then only decision will be taken AND after excess distribution his votes should comes to the required quota or NIL..
ReplyDeleteUpdated. It is excess above quota distribution of votes
ReplyDelete