30 May 2013

Guidelines for Appointment of Statutory Auditors in Public Sector Banks

Based on the recommendations of a Working Group (WG) to review the norms for empanelment of statutory auditors for public sector banks and other related issues and after seeking the approval of GoI, it has been decided to revise the guidelines on appointment of statutory auditors in public sector banks with effect from the year 2013-14. The revised eligibility norms for empanelment of SCAs as prescribed by RBI in consultation with the WG have been indicated in Annex 1. The categorization/eligibility norms for empanelment of branch auditors which have been kept unchanged are indicated in Annex 2.
The guidelines/instructions relating to the selection procedure to be followed for appointment of statutory auditors in PSBs and details thereof are furnished in Annex 3

Annex 1
Norms of Empanelment for Statutory Central Auditors
of Public Sector Banks applicable from the year 2013-14
As on 1 January of the relative year the firm should have
(i) minimum 7 full time chartered accountants, of which at least 5 should be full time partners exclusively associated* with the firm. These partners should have minimum continuous association with the firm i.e. one each should have continuous association with the firm at least for 15 years and 10 years , two with a minimum of 5 years each and one with a minimum of one year. The remaining 2 full-time chartered accountants or partners, as the case may be, should also have a continuous association with the firm for a period of one year*. Four of the partners should be FCAs. Also at least two of the partners should have minimum 15 and 10 years experience in practice. In case the paid Chartered Accountant available with the firm without any break was admitted as a partner of the said firm at a future date, his association with the firm as a partner will be counted from the date of his joining the firm as a paid Chartered Accountant.
*Note:
1. The definition of 'exclusive association' will be based on the following criteria:
(a) The full time partner should not be a partner in other firm/s.
(b) He should not be employed full time / part time elsewhere.
(c) He should not be practicing in his own name or engaged in practice otherwise or engaged in other activity which would be deemed to be in practice under Section 2(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
(d) The total compensation@ of the partner from the firm should not be below the following limit:
In case the Head office of the firms located in
(i) Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore and Hyderabad
ACA partner
` 1.80 lakh in a year (` 15000/- per month)
FCA partner
` 3.00 lakh in a year (` 25000/- per month)
(ii) Other places:
ACA partner
` 1.20 lakh in a year (` 10000/- per month)
FCA partner
` 1.80 lakh in a year (` 15000/- per month)
(e) A partner whose total compensation@ from the firm is less than the following will not be treated as exclusively associated with the firm :
Firms having more than 14 partners
1%
Firms having 10 to 14 partners
3%
Firms having 5 to 9 partners
5%
Firms having less than 5 partners
8%
@Total compensation =Sum total of share of profit, remuneration and interest on capital.
2. Out of the 7 full-time chartered accountants, the remaining two chartered accountants/partners (besides the 5 exclusively associated partners) will be treated to be exclusively associated with the firm only if they are continuously associated with the firm for a period of one year as on January 1 of the relevant year. These norms will be made applicable from the financial year 2014-15 i.e. the chartered accountants/partners will have to comply with the norms as on January 1, 2014.
(ii) the number of professional staff (excluding typists, stenographers, computer operators, secretary/ies and sub-ordinate staff etc.), consisting of audit and articled clerks with the knowledge in book-keeping and accountancy and are engaged in outdoor audit should be 18.
(iii) the standing of the firm should be of at least 15 years which would be reckoned from the date of availability of one full time FCA continuously with the firm.
(iv) the firm should have minimum statutory central audit experience of 15 years of public sector banks (before or after nationalisation) and/or by way of statutory branch audit thereof or that of statutory audit experience of a private sector bank. In case any of the partner of an audit firm is nominated / elected for a period of at least 3 years or more on the Board of any public sector bank then his / her such experience for a maximum period of three years will be considered as bank audit experience, provided such experience has not been earned by him/her concurrently i.e. when his / her firm was assigned statutory audit of any PSB, select all India financial Institutions or RBI.
(v) the firm should have statutory audit experience of 5 years of the public sector undertakings (either Central or State Government undertaking). While calculating such experience, more than one assignment given to a firm during a particular year or more than one year's statutory audit (audits in arrears) assigned to the firm will be reckoned, as one year experience only, for the purpose of counting such experience.
(vi) at least two partners of the firm or its paid Chartered Accountants must possess DISA/CISA or any other equivalent qualification.

Annex 2
Norms for the empanelment of audit firms to be appointed as statutory branch auditors for public sector banks (2013-14)
Cate-gory
No. of CAs exclusively associated with the firm
(Full time)
No. of partners exclusively associated with the firm (full time) (Out of 2)
Profe-ssional
staff
Bank audit experience
Standing of the audit firm
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
I.
5
3
8
The firm or at least one of the partners should have a minimum of 8 years experience of branch audit of a nationalised bank and/ or of a private sector bank .
8 years
II.
3
2
6
The firm or at least one of the partners should have preferably conducted branch audit of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank.
6 years
(for the firm or at least one partner)
III.
2
1
4
The firm or at least one of the CAs should have preferably conducted branch audit of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank for at least 3 years
5 years
(for the firm or at least one partner)
IV.
2                        2
Even proprietorship concern without bank audit experience may be considered as hitherto. (The proprietary concerns of Chartered Accountants with 1 paid CA, 2 professional staff and not having any statutory branch audit experience of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank will be treated at par with the partnership firm after deducting their 3 years seniority from the date of their establishment).
2
Not necessary
3 years



Annex 3
PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTMENT OF
STATUTORY AUDITORS IN PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
A. Statutory Central Auditors (SCAs)
1. For the year 2013-14 and onwards, GoI have approved the revision in the norms on the number of SCAs to be appointed in PSB as under:
i) Category "A" Banks (Large Banks viz. Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Canara Bank, Punjab National Bank, Central Bank of India and Union Bank of India) shall not have more than 6 SCAs. However, in case of SBI the number of SCAs shall not be more than 14.
ii) Category "B" Banks (Medium Banks viz. Allahabad Bank, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Syndicate Bank and UCO Bank) shall not have more than 5 SCAs, and;
iii) Category "C" Banks (Small Banks viz. Andhra Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Dena Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, United Bank of India, Vijaya Bank, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Patiala and State Bank of Travancore) shall not have more than 4 SCAs.
Actual numbers of SCAs to be appointed can be decided by respective boards subject to the above limit.
2. As per the existing practice, SCAs appointed will have a tenure of three years after which they will be rested for a period of two years. The appointment of SCAs will be made on an annual basis, subject to their fulfilling the eligibility norms prescribed by RBI from time to time and also subject to their suitability.
3. From the financial year 2013-14, selection of SCAs will be done by the Selection Committee constituted by GoI and the procedure that will be followed by RBI for forwarding the list of eligible audit firms for selection of SCAs by the Selection Committee constituted by GoI is as under :
  • After receipt of the list of eligible auditors / audit firms, based on the eligibility norms for empanelment of auditors / audit firms prescribed by RBI from the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG), verification of eligibility of audit firms by RBI with respect to their bank audit experience available with RBI will be done by RBI.
  • List of eligible firms after excluding the firms which are to be continued, rested and denied audit during the relevant year will be prepared by RBI and forwarded to GoI for selection by the Selection Committee.
  • After selection, GoI will advise bank-wise names of the selected firms to the respective banks. As per the statutory requirement, banks, in turn, are required to forward the names of the selected SCAS to RBI for its prior approval before their actual appointment.
B. Statutory Branch Auditors (SBAs)
1. The norms for selection of branches of PSBs for statutory audit from the year 2012-13 and onwards will be based on the following :
  1. For the year 2012-13, statutory branch audit of PSBs may be carried out for all branches with advances of ` 20 crore & above and 1/5th of the remaining branches covering a representative cross section of rural/semi-urban/urban and metropolitan branches, predominantly including branches which are not subjected to concurrent audit, so as to cover 90% of advances of a bank. CPUs/LPUs/and other centralized hubs by whatever nomenclature called would be included in the one fifth of the remaining branches every year.
  2. In respect of branches below the cut-off point, which are subject to concurrent audit by chartered accountants, henceforth, LFARs and other certifications done earlier by SBAs will now be submitted by the concurrent auditors and such branches may not generally be subject to statutory audit.
  3. Going forward, in mutual discussions with GoI and SCAs, based, inter alia, on the operational efficiency and robustness of CBS, system driven identification of NPAs, and integrity of MIS, managements of individual PSBs may decide on the threshold level of advances for the purpose of selecting branches for statutory audit.
  4. Progressively, the threshold level of advances may be increased so that the number of branches to be taken up for statutory audit is phased down over a period of time.
2. The following procedure will be followed for appointment statutory branch auditors (SBAs) in public sector banks (PSBs):
(i) The list of eligible auditors/audit firms will be prepared by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) as per the norms prescribed by RBI.
(ii) The above list will be subjected to scrutiny by RBI for identifying the continuing and rested firms and excluding audit firms against whom adverse remarks/disciplinary proceedings are pending or who have been denied audit.
(iii) RBI will, thereafter, forward the final list of all eligible auditors/audit firms to PSBs for selection.
(iv) The PSBs will select the required number of branch auditors/audit firms. Banks will be required to clearly advise the audit firms selected for consideration of appointment that each audit firm can take up audit assignment (branch audit) in one PSB only. The audit firm should give their consent in writing for consideration of appointment in the bank concerned for the particular year and the subsequent continuing years.
(v) The consent given by an audit firm will be treated as irrevocable and request, if any, from audit firms for changing the bank, after giving its consent to the bank concerned will not be entertained.
(vi) After the selection of branch auditors, PSBs will be required to recommend the names of both continuing and selected branch auditors to RBI for seeking its prior approval before their actual appointment, as per statutory requirement.
3. SBAs will have a maximum tenure of four years. The appointment of SBAs will be made on an annual basis, subject to their fulfilling the eligibility norms prescribed by RBI from time to time and also subject to their suitability.
4. The number of eligible auditors / audit firms is more than the number of branches to be audited at the following 33 centres (viz. Mumbai, Kolhapur, Pune, Solapur, Thane, Kolkata, Chennai, Coimbatore, Delhi/ New Delhi, Ajmer, Bikaner, Jaipur, Kota, Udaipur, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Hyderabad, Chandigarh, Raipur, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Panchkula, Panipat, Sonipat, Bangalore, Ernakulam, Indore, Nagpur, Ludhiana, Jodhpur, Bhilwara, and Ghaziabad). In such centres, the auditors/ audit firms will be put to a period of compulsory rest for two years after completion of four years of continuous branch audit. In other centres, where the number of eligible auditors / audit firms is less than the number of branches to be audited, the branch auditors on completion of four years of continuous branch audit will be subjected to the policy of rotation.
5. While allotting branches, banks are required to select auditors/audit firms which are in close proximity to their offices/branches. Banks are also required to have a suitable mix of various categories of auditors / audit firms while selecting the branch auditors keeping in view the size of the branches to be audited.
6. As regards statutory branch audit to be carried out by SCAs, banks will allot the top 20 branches(to be selected strictly in order of the level of outstanding advances) in such a manner as to cover a minimum of 15% of total gross advances of the bank by SCAs.
C. General Guidelines applicable to both SCAs and SBAs
(i) All PSBs are required to have a Board approved policy for appointment of statutory auditors and the same may be hosted on the bank's web-site. Banks are also required to ensure that the policy framed by the Board in the matter of selection of auditors/audit firms for appointment of auditors is strictly adhered to. Further, the list of firms selected for appointment as statutory branch auditors may be placed before the ACB/Board of bank before for its concurrence before it is forwarded to RBI for final approval.
(ii) The policy of one audit firm for one PSB will be continued. Accordingly an audit firm will be eligible to be appointed as a central/branch auditor of only one PSB during a particular year.
(iii) Further, an audit firm which takes up statutory central audit assignment in a PSB will not be eligible to be appointed as a statutory central auditor in a private sector/foreign bank during that particular year and vice versa. The policy has been made applicable from the year 2012-13 onwards.
(iv) In order to protect the independence of the auditors/audit firms, banks will have to make the appointments of SCA/branch auditors for a continuous period of three and four years respectively subject to the firms satisfying the eligibility norms each year. Banks cannot remove the audit firms during the above period without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India.

Guidelines for Appointment of Statutory Auditors in Public Sector Banks

Guidelines for Appointment of Statutory Auditors in Public Sector Banks
Based on the recommendations of a Working Group (WG) to review the norms for empanelment of statutory auditors for public sector banks and other related issues and after seeking the approval of GoI, it has been decided to revise the guidelines on appointment of statutory auditors in public sector banks with effect from the year 2013-14. The revised eligibility norms for empanelment of SCAs as prescribed by RBI in consultation with the WG have been indicated in Annex 1. The categorization/eligibility norms for empanelment of branch auditors which have been kept unchanged are indicated in Annex 2.

The guidelines/instructions relating to the selection procedure to be followed for appointment of statutory auditors in PSBs and details thereof are furnished in Annex 3


Annex 1

Norms of Empanelment for Statutory Central Auditors
of Public Sector Banks applicable from the year 2013-14

As on 1 January of the relative year the firm should have

(i) minimum 7 full time chartered accountants, of which at least 5 should be full time partners exclusively associated* with the firm. These partners should have minimum continuous association with the firm i.e. one each should have continuous association with the firm at least for 15 years and 10 years , two with a minimum of 5 years each and one with a minimum of one year. The remaining 2 full-time chartered accountants or partners, as the case may be, should also have a continuous association with the firm for a period of one year*. Four of the partners should be FCAs. Also at least two of the partners should have minimum 15 and 10 years experience in practice. In case the paid Chartered Accountant available with the firm without any break was admitted as a partner of the said firm at a future date, his association with the firm as a partner will be counted from the date of his joining the firm as a paid Chartered Accountant.

*Note:

1. The definition of 'exclusive association' will be based on the following criteria:

(a) The full time partner should not be a partner in other firm/s.

(b) He should not be employed full time / part time elsewhere.

(c) He should not be practicing in his own name or engaged in practice otherwise or engaged in other activity which would be deemed to be in practice under Section 2(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

(d) The total compensation@ of the partner from the firm should not be below the following limit:

In case the Head office of the firms located in

(i) Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore and Hyderabad

ACA partner` 1.80 lakh in a year (` 15000/- per month)
FCA partner` 3.00 lakh in a year (` 25000/- per month)

(ii) Other places:

ACA partner ` 1.20 lakh in a year (` 10000/- per month)
FCA partner` 1.80 lakh in a year (` 15000/- per month)

(e) A partner whose total compensation@ from the firm is less than the following will not be treated as exclusively associated with the firm :

Firms having more than 14 partners1%
Firms having 10 to 14 partners3%
Firms having 5 to 9 partners5%
Firms having less than 5 partners 8%
@Total compensation =Sum total of share of profit, remuneration and interest on capital.

2. Out of the 7 full-time chartered accountants, the remaining two chartered accountants/partners (besides the 5 exclusively associated partners) will be treated to be exclusively associated with the firm only if they are continuously associated with the firm for a period of one year as on January 1 of the relevant year. These norms will be made applicable from the financial year 2014-15 i.e. the chartered accountants/partners will have to comply with the norms as on January 1, 2014.

(ii) the number of professional staff (excluding typists, stenographers, computer operators, secretary/ies and sub-ordinate staff etc.), consisting of audit and articled clerks with the knowledge in book-keeping and accountancy and are engaged in outdoor audit should be 18.

(iii) the standing of the firm should be of at least 15 years which would be reckoned from the date of availability of one full time FCA continuously with the firm.

(iv) the firm should have minimum statutory central audit experience of 15 years of public sector banks (before or after nationalisation) and/or by way of statutory branch audit thereof or that of statutory audit experience of a private sector bank. In case any of the partner of an audit firm is nominated / elected for a period of at least 3 years or more on the Board of any public sector bank then his / her such experience for a maximum period of three years will be considered as bank audit experience, provided such experience has not been earned by him/her concurrently i.e. when his / her firm was assigned statutory audit of any PSB, select all India financial Institutions or RBI.

(v) the firm should have statutory audit experience of 5 years of the public sector undertakings (either Central or State Government undertaking). While calculating such experience, more than one assignment given to a firm during a particular year or more than one year's statutory audit (audits in arrears) assigned to the firm will be reckoned, as one year experience only, for the purpose of counting such experience.

(vi) at least two partners of the firm or its paid Chartered Accountants must possess DISA/CISA or any other equivalent qualification.


Annex 2

Norms for the empanelment of audit firms to be appointed as statutory branch auditors for public sector banks (2013-14)

Cate-gory

No. of CAs exclusively associated with the firm
(Full time)

No. of partners exclusively associated with the firm (full time) (Out of 2)

Profe-ssional
staff

Bank audit experience

Standing of the audit firm

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

I.

5

3

8

The firm or at least one of the partners should have a minimum of 8 years experience of branch audit of a nationalised bank and/ or of a private sector bank .

8 years

II.

3

2

6

The firm or at least one of the partners should have preferably conducted branch audit of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank.

6 years 
(for the firm or at least one partner)

III.

2

1

4

The firm or at least one of the CAs should have preferably conducted branch audit of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank for at least 3 years

5 years 
(for the firm or at least one partner)

IV.

2                        2
Even proprietorship concern without bank audit experience may be considered as hitherto. (The proprietary concerns of Chartered Accountants with 1 paid CA, 2 professional staff and not having any statutory branch audit experience of a nationalised bank or of a private sector bank will be treated at par with the partnership firm after deducting their 3 years seniority from the date of their establishment).

2

Not necessary

3 years

 

 


Annex 3

PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTMENT OF
STATUTORY AUDITORS IN PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS

A. Statutory Central Auditors (SCAs)

1. For the year 2013-14 and onwards, GoI have approved the revision in the norms on the number of SCAs to be appointed in PSB as under:

i) Category "A" Banks (Large Banks viz. Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Canara Bank, Punjab National Bank, Central Bank of India and Union Bank of India) shall not have more than 6 SCAs. However, in case of SBI the number of SCAs shall not be more than 14.

ii) Category "B" Banks (Medium Banks viz. Allahabad Bank, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Syndicate Bank and UCO Bank) shall not have more than 5 SCAs, and;

iii) Category "C" Banks (Small Banks viz. Andhra Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Dena Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, United Bank of India, Vijaya Bank, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Patiala and State Bank of Travancore) shall not have more than 4 SCAs.

Actual numbers of SCAs to be appointed can be decided by respective boards subject to the above limit.

2. As per the existing practice, SCAs appointed will have a tenure of three years after which they will be rested for a period of two years. The appointment of SCAs will be made on an annual basis, subject to their fulfilling the eligibility norms prescribed by RBI from time to time and also subject to their suitability.

3. From the financial year 2013-14, selection of SCAs will be done by the Selection Committee constituted by GoI and the procedure that will be followed by RBI for forwarding the list of eligible audit firms for selection of SCAs by the Selection Committee constituted by GoI is as under :

  • After receipt of the list of eligible auditors / audit firms, based on the eligibility norms for empanelment of auditors / audit firms prescribed by RBI from the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG), verification of eligibility of audit firms by RBI with respect to their bank audit experience available with RBI will be done by RBI.

  • List of eligible firms after excluding the firms which are to be continued, rested and denied audit during the relevant year will be prepared by RBI and forwarded to GoI for selection by the Selection Committee.

  • After selection, GoI will advise bank-wise names of the selected firms to the respective banks. As per the statutory requirement, banks, in turn, are required to forward the names of the selected SCAS to RBI for its prior approval before their actual appointment.

B. Statutory Branch Auditors (SBAs)

1. The norms for selection of branches of PSBs for statutory audit from the year 2012-13 and onwards will be based on the following :

  1. For the year 2012-13, statutory branch audit of PSBs may be carried out for all branches with advances of ` 20 crore & above and 1/5th of the remaining branches covering a representative cross section of rural/semi-urban/urban and metropolitan branches, predominantly including branches which are not subjected to concurrent audit, so as to cover 90% of advances of a bank. CPUs/LPUs/and other centralized hubs by whatever nomenclature called would be included in the one fifth of the remaining branches every year.

  2. In respect of branches below the cut-off point, which are subject to concurrent audit by chartered accountants, henceforth, LFARs and other certifications done earlier by SBAs will now be submitted by the concurrent auditors and such branches may not generally be subject to statutory audit.

  3. Going forward, in mutual discussions with GoI and SCAs, based, inter alia, on the operational efficiency and robustness of CBS, system driven identification of NPAs, and integrity of MIS, managements of individual PSBs may decide on the threshold level of advances for the purpose of selecting branches for statutory audit.

  4. Progressively, the threshold level of advances may be increased so that the number of branches to be taken up for statutory audit is phased down over a period of time.

2. The following procedure will be followed for appointment statutory branch auditors (SBAs) in public sector banks (PSBs):

(i) The list of eligible auditors/audit firms will be prepared by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) as per the norms prescribed by RBI.

(ii) The above list will be subjected to scrutiny by RBI for identifying the continuing and rested firms and excluding audit firms against whom adverse remarks/disciplinary proceedings are pending or who have been denied audit.

(iii) RBI will, thereafter, forward the final list of all eligible auditors/audit firms to PSBs for selection.

(iv) The PSBs will select the required number of branch auditors/audit firms. Banks will be required to clearly advise the audit firms selected for consideration of appointment that each audit firm can take up audit assignment (branch audit) in one PSB only. The audit firm should give their consent in writing for consideration of appointment in the bank concerned for the particular year and the subsequent continuing years.

(v) The consent given by an audit firm will be treated as irrevocable and request, if any, from audit firms for changing the bank, after giving its consent to the bank concerned will not be entertained.

(vi) After the selection of branch auditors, PSBs will be required to recommend the names of both continuing and selected branch auditors to RBI for seeking its prior approval before their actual appointment, as per statutory requirement.

3. SBAs will have a maximum tenure of four years. The appointment of SBAs will be made on an annual basis, subject to their fulfilling the eligibility norms prescribed by RBI from time to time and also subject to their suitability.

4. The number of eligible auditors / audit firms is more than the number of branches to be audited at the following 33 centres (viz. Mumbai, Kolhapur, Pune, Solapur, Thane, Kolkata, Chennai, Coimbatore, Delhi/ New Delhi, Ajmer, Bikaner, Jaipur, Kota, Udaipur, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Hyderabad, Chandigarh, Raipur, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Panchkula, Panipat, Sonipat, Bangalore, Ernakulam, Indore, Nagpur, Ludhiana, Jodhpur, Bhilwara, and Ghaziabad). In such centres, the auditors/ audit firms will be put to a period of compulsory rest for two years after completion of four years of continuous branch audit. In other centres, where the number of eligible auditors / audit firms is less than the number of branches to be audited, the branch auditors on completion of four years of continuous branch audit will be subjected to the policy of rotation.

5. While allotting branches, banks are required to select auditors/audit firms which are in close proximity to their offices/branches. Banks are also required to have a suitable mix of various categories of auditors / audit firms while selecting the branch auditors keeping in view the size of the branches to be audited.

6. As regards statutory branch audit to be carried out by SCAs, banks will allot the top 20 branches(to be selected strictly in order of the level of outstanding advances) in such a manner as to cover a minimum of 15% of total gross advances of the bank by SCAs.

C. General Guidelines applicable to both SCAs and SBAs

(i) All PSBs are required to have a Board approved policy for appointment of statutory auditors and the same may be hosted on the bank's web-site. Banks are also required to ensure that the policy framed by the Board in the matter of selection of auditors/audit firms for appointment of auditors is strictly adhered to. Further, the list of firms selected for appointment as statutory branch auditors may be placed before the ACB/Board of bank before for its concurrence before it is forwarded to RBI for final approval.

(ii) The policy of one audit firm for one PSB will be continued. Accordingly an audit firm will be eligible to be appointed as a central/branch auditor of only one PSB during a particular year.

(iii) Further, an audit firm which takes up statutory central audit assignment in a PSB will not be eligible to be appointed as a statutory central auditor in a private sector/foreign bank during that particular year and vice versa. The policy has been made applicable from the year 2012-13 onwards.

(iv) In order to protect the independence of the auditors/audit firms, banks will have to make the appointments of SCA/branch auditors for a continuous period of three and four years respectively subject to the firms satisfying the eligibility norms each year. Banks cannot remove the audit firms during the above period without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India.

Registration Certificates for export of cotton

W.e.f 01-07-2013,Online application for grant of Registration Certificates for export of cotton, cotton yarn, non-basmati rice, wheat and sugar mandatory. [Trade Notice 3/2013 of 28-05-2013].

29 May 2013

Section 40(a)(ia) applies to transaction made during the year

Section 40(a)(ia) applies to transaction made during the year under Income Tax Act, in the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Sikandarkhan N Tunvar.

FVU 3.71 mandatory w.e.f 26-05-2013 for quarterly TDS/TCS statements



FVU 3.71 mandatory w.e.f 26-05-2013 for quarterly TDS/TCS statements from financial year 2010-11. 80CCG added, 80CCF removed. No need for 85% PAN for TCS on bullion and jewellery.

28 May 2013

The refund of interest paid on delayed payment of service tax



The refund of interest paid on delayed payment of service tax, which is not liable to pay , shall not allowed if the liability of service tax has been admitted. Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in case of Skoda Auto India Private Limited versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad (2012) 28 taxmann.com 58 (Mumbai-CESTAT) in Order No.-A/382/2012-WZB/C-I(CSTB), dated 05 June, 2012.

27 May 2013

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is spreading e-tax net



The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is spreading e-tax net through [Notification no. 34/2013, dated 01.05.2013]. E-filing of IT returns is now mandatory for individuals, including salaried taxpayers earning more than Rs 5 lakh taxable income during the financial year ended 31-03-2013.

Exemption u/s. 10(23C)



Exemption u/s. 10(23C), (vi) can be claimed without applying for registration u/s 12A of Income Tax Act. [High Court of Allahabad Jeevan deep charitable trust].

25 May 2013

RRB Audit Fee revision

This is to bring to your notice that RRB audit fee revised by NABARD vide circular .No.-NB.IDD.RRCBD.BMBL/323-D/2013-14 date 22-05-2013. All RRB auditor's will get fee for 2012-13 as per revised rates.

Service Tax Amnesty acknowledgement

Service Tax Department to issue acknowledgement of discharge in Form VCES-3 in 7 days from furnishing of details of payment of tax and interest. Service Tax Amnesty Scheme.

Cheque return charges

Cheque return charges only where customer at fault. Cheque without any recourse to payee to be resent in the next clearing within 24 hours. RBI Circular of 07-05-2013.

Empanelment as financial experts

Applications are invited from practising Chartered Accountants/CA firms for empanelment as financial experts for Biotech Consortium India Limited (BCIL), New Delhi.

24 May 2013

Form 16A, 27D for Quarter four by 30-05-2013 and Form 16 by 31-05-2013


Issue Form 16A, 27D for Quarter four by 30-05-2013 and Form 16 by 31-05-2013. Mandatory for all to download Form 16(Part A) and Form 16A from www.tdscpc.gov.in.

Business responsibility report to be part of Annual report


Business responsibility report to be part of Annual report w.e.f financial year ending 31-12-2012.optional for other listed companies. SEBI Circular of 13-08-2012.

Protective additions in the hand of minors

Protective additions in the hand of minors not required if the same been made on substantive basis in the hand of father under Income Tax Act. [ITAT Delhi Bench master Akshay Bansal].

22 May 2013

Service Tax Returns, (ST- 3) for July -September, 2012

Service Tax Returns, (ST- 3) for July -September, 2012, e-filed in ACES can now be viewed under View Original ST3 and View ST-3 options under RET module of ACES.

Commission paid to related parties for services

Commission paid to related parties for services rendered by them is allowable expenditure under Income Tax Act. High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, Naval Technoplast Industries Limited.

21 May 2013

Excise Duty in closing stock

If liability to pay excise duty is not incurred, excise duty is not to be included in closing stock.
High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, Bell Granito Ceramica Limited.

Issue of equity shares under FDI

Issue of equity shares under FDI Scheme allowed under Government route against Pre-operative/Pre-incorporation expenses. RBI Circular 104 of 17-05-2013.

20 May 2013

Molasses produced during manufacturing of sugar not scrap

Molasses produced during manufacturing of sugar not scrap for the purpose of section 206C of Income Tax Act. ITAT Amritsar Bench Nawanshahar Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd.

Dena Bank concurrent audit

Dena Bank invites applications for appointment of CA firms for conduct of Concurrent Audit of the Branches from July, 2013 to June, 2014.

18 May 2013

Date for filing the ST-3 return, for the period from October, 2012 to March, 2013

Date for filing the ST-3 return, for the period from October, 2012 to March, 2013 has been extended from 25th April, 2013 to 31st August, 2013. Order No. 03/2013-ST, [F.No.137/99/2011-Service Tax], dated 23-04-2013.

EPF Rate for 2012-13

Government notifies Employee Provident Fund rate for 2012-13 at 8.5%. Those who settled or transferred their accounts in last 14 months to approach Provident Fund department for balance 0.25%.

Reopening not valid

Reopening not valid if reasons silent on quantum of escaped tax under Income Tax Act. Allahabad High Court, Mahesh Kumar Gupta.

16 May 2013

CBEC clarifies certain issues on Service Tax Amnesty Scheme

CBEC clarifies certain issues on Service Tax Amnesty Scheme
SERVICE TAX VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE ENCOURAGEMENT SCHEME - CBEC CLARIFIES CERTAIN ISSUES – MERE PENDENCY OF LETTER SEEKING GENERAL INFORMATION NOT AN IMPEDIMENT TO PERSON SEEKING THIS SCHEME
CIRCULAR NO. 169/4/2013-ST [F.NO.B1/19/2013-TRU], DATED 13-5-2013
The Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) has come into effect upon enactment of the Finance Bill, 2013 on the 10th May, 2013. The Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Rules, 2013 has been issued to bring into effect the Scheme. Some references have been received seeking clarification as regards the scope and applicability of the Scheme.
2. The issues have been examined and clarifications thereto are as follows:
S. No.
Issues
Clarification
1
Whether a person who has not obtained service tax registration so far can make a declaration under VCES?
Any person who has tax dues to declare can make a declaration in terms of the provisions of VCES. If such person does not already have a service tax registration he will be required to take registration before making such declaration.
2
Whether a declarant shall get immunity from payment of late fee/penalty for having not taken registration earlier or not filed the return or for delay in filing of return.
Yes. It has been provided in VCES that, beside interest and penalty, immunity would also be available from any other proceeding under the Finance Act, 1994 and Rules made thereunder.
3
Whether an assessee to whom show-cause notice or order of determination has been issued can file declaration in respect of tax dues which are not covered by such SCN or order of determination?
In terms of section 106 (1) of the Finance Act, 2013 and second proviso thereto, the tax dues in respect of which any show cause notice or order of determination under section 72, section 73 or section 73A has been issued or which pertains to the same issue for the subsequent period are excluded from the ambit of the Scheme. Any other tax dues could be declared under the Scheme subject to the other provisions of the Scheme.
4
What is the scope of section 106(2)(a)(iii)?
Whether a communication from department seeking general information from the declarant would lead to invoking of section 106 (2) (a)(iii) for rejection of declaration under the said section?
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) of the Finance Act, 2013 provides for rejection of declaration if such declaration is made by a person against whom an inquiry or investigation in respect of service tax not levied or not paid or short-levied or short paid, has been initiated by way of requiring production of accounts, documents or other evidence under the chapter or the rules made thereunder, and such inquiry or investigation is pending as on the 1st day of March, 2013.
The relevant provisions, beside section 14 of the Central Excise Act as made applicable to service tax vide section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, under which accounts, documents or other evidences can be requisitioned by the Central Excise Officer for the purposes of inquiry or investigation, are as follows,-
(i) Section 72 of the Act envisages requisition of documents and evidences by the Central Excise Officer if any person liable to pay service tax fails to furnish the return or having made a return fails to assess the tax in accordance with the provision of the Chapter or rules made thereunder.
(ii) Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 prescribes for requisition of specified documents by an officer authorised by the Commissioner for the purposes specified therein.
The provision of section 106(2)(a)(iii) shall be attracted only in such cases where accounts, documents or other evidences are requisitioned by the authorised officer from the declarant under the authority of any of the above stated statutory provisions and the inquiry so initiated against the declarant is pending as on the 1st day of March, 2013.
No other communication from the department would attract the provisions of section 106(2)(a)(iii) and thus would not lead to rejection of the declaration.
3. Trade Notice/Public Notice may be issued to the field formations and tax payers.


No penalty on gift of Resurgent India Bonds from Non Relative NRI under Income Tax Act.

No penalty on gift of Resurgent India Bonds from Non Relative NRI under Income Tax Act.
In the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, Smt.Sangeeta Rathi.

11 May 2013

President Assent to Finance Bill 2013

Finance Bill gets enacted as Act No.17 of 2013; President gives assent on 10th May,2013

Constitution Amendment Bill 2011

revised E-TDS Fee


Revised filing fee for E-TDS/TCS, Form 24G & AIR at TIN-FCs: 0100 records: Rs 35, 100- 1000 records: Rs 200 and more than 1000 records: Rs 650 (inclusive of ST).

10 May 2013

S. 40(a)(ia) TDS: Special Bench verdict in Merilyn Shipping is not good law

S. 40(a)(ia) TDS: Special Bench verdict in Merilyn Shipping is not good law

The assessee, engaged in the business of transport contractor and commission agent, incurred expenditure of Rs. 8.74 crores on payment to contractors where no TDS was deducted. The AO & CIT(A) held that the expenditure had to be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia). On appeal, the Tribunal, relying on Merilyn Shipping & Transports 146 TTJ 1 (Viz) (SB) held that as the said amount had already been paid and was not "payable" as of 31st March, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) could not be made. On appeal by the department to the High Court, HELD reversing the Tribunal:

In Merilyn Shipping 146 TTJ 1 (Viz) (SB) the majority held that as the Finance Bill proposed the words "amount credited or paid" and as the Finance Act used the words "amounts payable", s. 40(a)(ia) could only apply to amounts that are outstanding as of 31st March and not to amounts already paid during the year. This view is not correct for two reasons. Firstly, a strict reading of s. 40(a)(ia) shows that all that it requires is that there should be an amount payable of the nature described, which is such on which tax is deductible at source but such tax has not been deducted or if deducted not paid before the due date. The provision nowhere requires that the amount which is payable must remain so payable throughout during the year. If the assessee's interpretation is accepted, it would lead to a situation where the assessee who though was required to deduct the tax at source but no such deduction was made or more flagrantly deduction though made is not paid to the Government, would escape the consequence only because the amount was already paid over before the end of the year in contrast to another assessee who would otherwise be in similar situation but in whose case the amount remained payable till the end of the year. There is no logic why the legislature would have desired to bring about such irreconcilable and diverse consequences. Secondly, the principle of deliberate or conscious omission is applied mainly when an existing provision is amended and a change is brought about. The Special Bench was wrong in comparing the language used in the draft bill to that used in the final enactment to assign a particular meaning to s. 40(a)(ia). Accordingly, Merilyn Shippingdoes not lay down correct law. The correct law is that s. 40(a)(ia) covers not only to the amounts which are payable as on 31th March of a particular year but also which are payable at any time during the year.

Post Budget changes in Custom and Excise Duty rate

Post Budget changes in Custom and Excise Duty rates w.e.f. 08.05.2013[Notification Nos 16/2013-Central Excise,25/2013-Customs and 26/2013 –Customs, all dated 8th May, 2013 have been issued on 08.05.2013]

09 May 2013

Amendment to Abatement Notification on Construction Complex Service

Note on Change in Abatement in Construction Complex Service
Abatement Notification No.02/2013 dt.01/03/2013 has been amended.
To avail the abatement of 75% in the case of Construction of Complex Service both the following conditions to be satisfied:
1.in carpet area of the unit is less than 2000 square feet; and
2.the amount charged for the unit is less than rupees one core

07 May 2013

Security Service Service tax

Security services used for securing office premises are eligible as input service under Service Tax Act. [CESTAT Bangalore bench, C. Cubed Solutions (P) Ltd.]

04 May 2013

e Filing of Tax Audit Report Mandatory

Audit report to be filed electronically; threshold limit for e-filing of return reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs; return can't be filed in ITR-1 if assessee earns exempt income which exceeds 5,000.
Income-tax (3rd Amendment) Rules, 2013 redefines the conditions and eligibility to choose from a variety of Income-tax return forms. In addition, certain important amendments are also being brought in, which are as follows:
1) Return in ITR 1 can't be filed if assessee incurs losses under the head 'Income from other sources'.
2) Return in ITR 1 can't be filed if assessee claims tax relief or has any income which is exempt under Chapter III. i.e. section 10, 10A, 10AA, etc.
3) Return in ITR 4S can't be filed if assessee claims tax relief or has any income which is exempt under Chapter III. i.e. section 10, 10A, 10AA, etc.
4) Mandatory e-filing of audit reports.
5) Mandatory e-filing of return if income exceeds Rs. 5,00,000 or if assessee claims tax relief.

03 May 2013

No TAN for immovable property purchase

Finance Bill 2013 amendment: No need for buyer to obtain TAN to deduct tax from payment made for purchasing immovable property of more than 50 lacs.

5% TDS in Long Term Infra bonds

Finance Bill 2013 amendment of Sec 206AA: TDS normal rate of 5% on interest on long-term infrastructure bonds to NRI even if he does not have PAN.

02 May 2013

TCS on gold

W.e.f. 01-06-2013, TCS @ 1% applicable on cash purchase of more than Rs 2 lacs of coins or other articles of upto 10 grams also which were till now exempt.

Section 12A


Six month time limit for disposal of trust registration application is directory under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. [High Court of Madras Sheela Christian Charitable Trust].

30 April 2013

Central govt DA


Dearness allowance (DA) enhanced for Central Government employees with effect from 01.01.2013 from 72% to 80%.[Notification No. 1(2)/2013-E-II(B) Date: 25.04.2013]

Amendments to Finance Bill 2013

The Finance Bill 2013 has been passed by the Lok Sabha today (30.04.2013) after incorporating several important amendments. Among the important amendments is the proposed insertion of sub-section (3) to s. 252 to provide that the Central Government may inter alia appoint a person who is a sitting or retired Judge of a High Court as the President of the Tribunal

29 April 2013

NO ST on CHIT


ST : Notification No.26/2012-ST dated 20-6-2012 quashed
ST : In a chit business, the subscription is tendered in any one of the forms of 'money' as defined in section 65B(33). It would, therefore, be a transaction in money. So considered, the transaction would fall within the exclusionary part of the definition of the word 'service' as being merely a transaction in money. This would be the result if the argument that the exclusionary part of the definition in clause (a) of section 65B(44) is considered to have been enacted ex abundant cautela; if the argument based on Explanation 2 to section 65B(44) read with the exclusionary part of the definition is accepted as correct, even then the services rendered by the foreman of the chit business for which a separate consideration is charged, not being an activity of the nature explained in the said Explanation, would be out of the clutches of the definition. Either way, there can be no levy of service tax on the footing that the services of a foreman of a chit business constitute a taxable service

Coaching Institute as trust

Coaching institute cannot be treated and registered as a charitable institution under Income Tax Act. [ITAT Cochin Bench M Star Charitable Society]

28 April 2013

Cenvat credit on Construction can be used for ST on Renting


Cenvat credit on Construction can be used for ST on Renting


Excise paid on Inputs and ST on Input services used in construction can be utilized for discharging ST liability on renting of immovable property
 The Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of Oberoi Mall Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax [2013-TIOL-604-CESTAT-MUM] has granted unconditional stay from recovery of Cenvat credit and penalty, the case is discussed as under:
 Issue:
 Whether excise duty paid on Inputs and Service Tax on Input services used in construction sector can be utilized for discharging Service Tax liability on renting of immovable property?
 Facts of the case:
 Oberoi Mall Ltd. ("The Appellant") is engaged in rendering the taxable service of 'renting of immovable property' and discharge service tax liability. The Appellant availed CENVAT credit of various services used for construction of the said mall and utilized the credit for payment of service tax on renting of immovable property services.
 The Central Board of Excise & Customs ("the CBEC") vide a Circular No.96/7/2007-ST dated 23/08/2007 as amended by Circular No 98/1/2007-S.T., dated 04/01/2008 ("the Circular") interalia clarified that commercial or industrial construction service or works contract service is an input service to the output 'immovable property' which is neither a service nor goods. Therefore, CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on construction service or works contract service cannot be taken.
 In view of the above Circular, the authorities issued show cause notice ("the SCN") to the Appellant proposing to deny CENVAT credit taken by the Appellant during the period April 2008 to March 2009 out of which an amount of Rs. 1,15,14,402/- was utilized for payment of service tax on the renting of immovable property service.

The SCN was adjudicated and the impugned order was passed wherein CENVAT credit of Rs. 6,00,63,212/- availed by the Appellant was disallowed in terms of Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 ("the Credit Rules") read with Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 ("the Finance Act"). Also, credits of Rs. 32,24,111/- and Rs. 15,62,151/- taken by the Appellant were also disallowed in respect of input services such as security, telephone, commission, brokerage, advertising, repairs, installation, etc.
 Interest on the credit wrongly taken was demanded under Section 75 of the Finance Act and a penalty of Rs, 6,48,48,474/- was imposed on the Appellant under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules read with Section 78 of the Finance Act and another penalty of Rs. 5,000/- was imposed under Section 77 thereof.
 Held:
 The Hon'ble Tribunal has held that Excise duty paid on Inputs and Service Tax paid on Input services used in the construction of immovable property can be taken and utilized for discharging ST liability on the renting of such immovable property and granted unconditional waiver from the pre-deposit of the dues adjudged against the Appellant and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the Appeal on the basis of/ relying upon the following case laws:
1. Sai Sahmita Storages (P) Ltd. [2011 (270) ELT 33 (AP)] - The appellant was providing the service of storage and warehousing and took credit of excise duty paid on cement, iron bars, expansion bellows and pipes, etc. used in the manufacture of warehouse. The Hon'ble High Court noted that considering the definition of 'inputs' and 'input services' provided in the Credit Rules, the appellant was entitled for availment of credit on the excise duty paid on various inputs for payment of tax as the output services, namely, storage and warehousing services.
2. Navaratna S.G. Highway Property Pvt. Ltd. [2012 (28) STR 166 (Tri-Ahmd)] - The issue involved was availment of CENVAT credit of the service tax paid on 'commercial construction service, security service, advertising service, etc. The Hon'ble Tribunal held that excise duty paid on inputs and service tax paid on input services on the construction of malls can be taken as credit and utilized for payment of service tax on renting of immovable property when the mall is rented out.
Further to Note:
It is worthwhile to note that w.e.f. April 1, 2011 vide Notification No. 3/2011-C.E. (N.T.) dated March 1, 2011, definition of input and input services has been changed and any goods or specified input services used in construction contract or construction service has been excluded from the definition of input and input services respectively.
 Bimal Jain
FCA, ACS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)  

27 April 2013

Exemption u/s. 11

Exemption u/s. 11 cannot be denied on mere non-compliance with provisions of Trust Act in earlier years under Income Tax Act. [High Court of Bombay G.K.R. Charities]

Service tax on customized software

Software developed as per customer's specifications are liable to service tax.[CESTAT, Mumbai Bench 3i Infotech Ltd]

26 April 2013

Tolerance Limit-Arm's Length Price-TP

SECTION 92C OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - COMPUTATION OF ARM'S LENGTH PRICE - NOTIFIED TOLERABLE LIMIT FOR DETERMINATION OF ALP
NOTIFICATION NO. 30/2013 [F.NO.500/185/2011-FTD-I], DATED 15-4-2013
In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm's length price determined under section 92C and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed one per cent of the latter for wholesale traders and three per cent of the latter in all other cases, the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken shall be deemed to be the arm's length price for assessment year 2013-14.

24 April 2013

Same Income can't be taxed twice

Same Income cannot be taxed both in the hand of Individual and HUF based on AIR information under Income Tax Act. [ITAT Mumbai Jyotindra Natwarlal Naik]

EPF

Download PF Member data in excel from www.epfindia.gov.in. Fill missing details, convert in text file and upload same on PF website by 26-04-2013.

Download Part A of Form 16


From FY 2012-13 download Part A of Form 16 (TDS and Deposit) from www.traces.gov.inand prepare Part B (Salary and Deductions) himself. [Circular 4/2013 of 17-04-2013]

Due date of filing half yearly ST-3 return extended to 31st August, 2013

Due date of filing half yearly ST-3 return extended to 31st August, 2013

image
SECTION 70 OF THE FINANCE ACT, 1994, READ WITH RULE 7 OF THE SERVICE TAX RULES, 1994 - FURNISHING OF RETURNS – DUE DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF FORM ST-3 FOR PERIOD FROM 1-10-2012 TO 31-3-2013 EXTENDED FROM 25-4-2013 TO 31-8-2013
ORDER NO. 3/2013-ST [F.NO.137/99/2011-ST], DATED 23-4-2013
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the Central Board of Excise & Customs hereby extends the date of submission of the Form ST-3, for the period from 1st October 2012 to 31st March 2013, from 25th April, 2013 to 31st August, 2013.
The circumstances of a special nature, which have given rise to this extension of time, are as follows:
"The Form ST-3, for the period from 1st October 2012 to 31st March 2013, is expected to be available on ACES around 31st of July, 2013".

22 April 2013

Re-open by AO

Reopening solely on basis of objection of audit party without application of mind by AO is not valid under Income Tax Act. [High Court of Gujrat Jagat Jayantilal Parikh]

20 April 2013

Investor Grievances

All listed companies to redress investor grievances and inform them in 30 days of receipt of complaints. Failure to attract penal action.[CIR/OIAE/1/2013 of 17-04-2013]

19 April 2013

Section 80-IA(5)

Section 80-IA(5) – Absorbed losses pre `initial assessment year' need not be set off under Income Tax Act. [ITAT Mumbai M/s. Shevie Exports]

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...