10 August 2011

CBEC on Stock Broker's Services

SECTION 65(101) OF THE FINANCE ACT, 1994 - STOCK BROKER'S SERVICES - LEVY OF SERVICE TAX ON DELAYED PAYMENT CHARGES COLLECTED BY SERVICE PROVIDER IN RESPECT OF STOCK BROKER'S SERVICES
LETTER [F.NO. 137/25/2011 - SERVICE TAX], DATED 3-8-2011
Representations have been received seeking clarification regarding leviability of service tax on the additional amount that is collected towards the delay in making payment to the stock brokers by their customers (delayed payment charges) in respect of Stock Broker's services.
2. The matter has been examined. Clarifications issued by the Board in the past on similar issues are summed up below:-
  (i)  Circular No. 96/7/2007 at para 002.01 clarifies that an amount collected for delayed payment of a telephone bill is not to be treated as consideration charged for provision of telecom service and therefore, does not form a part of the value of taxable service.
 (ii)  Circular No. 121/02/2010 - ST, dated 26-4-2010 clarifies that detention charges in respect of detained containers are not in respect of service provided on behalf of client (under BAS) nor is it on account of infrastructure support services (under BSS). Such charges can at best be called as 'penal rent' for retaining the containers beyond the predetermined period. Therefore, the amount collected as 'detention charges' is not chargeable to service tax.
2.1 In a similar manner, delayed payment charges received by the stock brokers are not includible in taxable value as the same are not the charges for providing taxable services. Such charges are on account of delay in making payments by the service recipient to the service provider and are in the nature of a penal charge for not making the payment within stipulated time. Such amounts are not includible in the taxable value for charging service tax. This principle will also apply to other service providers.
3. However, section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides that service tax is chargeable on taxable value which shall be the 'gross amount charged' by the service provider. Therefore, if in the account statement/invoice/bill, etc. issued by the service provider, only the gross amount is shown without indicating the delayed payment charges separately, the service tax would be payable on the entire amount. Delayed payment charges would not be includible in 'gross value charged' only if these charges are shown separately in the account statement/invoice/bill etc.
4. Pending cases, if any, on this issue may be decided in line with the above clarification.



No comments:

Post a Comment

What do you think about this? Please write your comment.

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...