WISH YOU HAPPY DIWALI
The Income Tax Department has released a Notification for PAN application-SEE ATTACHMENT
S.No | Correction required in Field name | Period of Correction Request (from Challan Deposit Date) |
1 | TAN/PAN | 7 days |
2 | Assessment Year | 7 days |
3 | Amount | 7 days |
4 | Other fields (Major head, Minor head, Nature of payment) | Within 3 months |
BSR Code | Challan Tender Date (Cash/Cheque Deposit Date) | Challan Sl. No. | |||||
Sl. No. | Fields in which correction required | Please Tick | Original Details | Modified Details | |||
1. | TAN/PAN (10 digit) | ||||||
2. | Assessment Year (YYYY) | ||||||
3. | Major Head code (4 digit) | ||||||
4. | Minor Head code (3 digit) | ||||||
5. | Nature of Payment (3 digit) | ||||||
6. | Total Amount (13 digit) | ||||||
Sl. No. | Appellate Forum | Monetary limit |
1. | CESTAT | Rs.5,00,000 |
2. | HIGH COURTS | Rs.10,00,000 |
3. | SUPREME COURT | Rs.25,00,000 |
Issues | Clarifications |
(a) Whether duty involved mentioned in the Instruction dated 20-10-2010 refers to duty outstanding to be collected or the total duty demanded for deciding the threshold limit prescribed therein. | In a case where a part of the duty demanded is not disputed and is paid and the outstanding duty under dispute is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Board, no appeal shall be filed. In other words, monetary limit shall apply on the disputed duty and not on the total duty demanded in a case. |
(b) Whether monetary limits would apply to cases of refund. | It is clarified that the monetary limits being prescribed by the Board would apply to cases of refund as well. |
(c) Whether applications being filed by the Department before office of Joint Secretary (Revision Application) would also be covered under the stipulation of monetary limits. | The limit specified herein will not be applicable to application filed before the Joint Secretary (Revision Application). |
(d) Whether exclusion of audit objections mentioned in para 6(c) of Instruction dated 20-10-2010 would cover internal audit objection cases also or whether they would be limited to cases of revenue audit alone. | The intention was to apply the exclusion clause mentioned at para 6(c) only to disputes arising out of revenue audit objections accepted by the Department. It has now been decided to delete the said exclusion clause (refer para 3 of this Instruction). Therefore, in all cases of audit objections accepted by the Department, while protective demands may continue to be issued but the same would be subjected to the monetary limits for filing appeal in the Tribunal, High Courts and the Supreme Court. |
Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...