10 July 2016
Result of CA Final Exam and CPT on 18th July 2016
08 July 2016
Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) notified under Section 145 (2) of the Income -tax Act, 1961 to be applicable from 1stApril, 2016
The revision of ICDS/issue of clarifications as recommended by the Committee, is under consideration. The revision of the Tax Audit Report is also being made for ensuring the compliance with the provisions of ICDS and for capturing the disclosures mandated by the ICDS.
Some of the tax payers might have filed their return of income and obtained Tax Audit Report without incorporating the compliance with the ICDS and related disclosures in the absence of the revised Tax Audit Report. Considering these facts, it has been decided that the ICDS shall be applicable from 1.4.2016 i.e. previous year 2016-17 (Assessment Year 2017-18). The notification to this effect will be issued shortly.
06 July 2016
SC scanner over PwC, KPMG, Deloitte, E&Y, others over Bengaluru man’s complaint
By: FE Bureau | New Delhi | Published: July 5, 2016 6:36 AM
According to the PIL filed by CPIL, PwC and its network firms indulged in activities in breach of various statutes and policies. (PTI)
The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), the regulatory body for chartered accountants in India, to file a status report as to what action it has taken against top foreign multinational accounting firms which, in the guise of providing management consultancy services, have expanded to other fields such as accounting, auditing, book-keeping and taxation. Such operations cannot be undertaken by non-Indian entities.
A bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra also sought response from the Centre on an appeal filed by Bengaluru-based tax consultant S Sukumar, alleging violation by various accounting firms like PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, and Ernst and Young.
While lawyers representing the top firms denied any wrongdoing, counsel Prashant Bhushan alleged that some MNCs are providing auditing services in India through “surrogate companies”, thus violating the Chartered Accountants Act.
The ICAI told the court that it has already initiated action against 170 entities in India. Sukumar has sought direction to the ICAI to probe the functioning of these Indian firms that have tie-ups with foreign firms for breach of Code of Professional Conduct prescribed in the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Referring to the 2009 Satyam scam, Bhushan pointed out that PwC has been found guilty of fabricating the accounts of Satyam and the same firm is the auditor for Kingfisher Airlines. He demanded an inquiry into the firm’s alleged financial malpractices and fudging of accounts.
According to the PIL filed by CPIL, PwC and its network firms indulged in activities in breach of various statutes and policies.
05 July 2016
CBEC Clarification on Recovery of Demands
CBEC Clarification reg. Recovery of Confirmed Demands during the pendency of Stay Application
SEBI has issued a fresh guidelines comprising Revised Formats for Financial Results
http://www.sebi.gov.in/cms/sebi_data/attachdocs/1467712561526.pdf
EXTRACT For the quarter ending June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016:
(i) The timeline for submitting the financial results in compliance with the provisions of this Circular is extended by one month. The results for the quarter ending June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016 may be submitted by September 14, 2016 and December 14, 2016 respectively.
(ii) For the quarter ending June 30, 2016, Ind-AS compliant financial results for the corresponding quarter ended June 30, 2015shall be provided. For the quarter ending September 30, 2016, Ind-AS compliant financial results for the corresponding year to date / quarter ended September 30, 2015 shall be provided. However, in such cases, limited review or audit of the same is not mandatory.
(iii) For the quarter ending June 30, 2016, submission of Ind-AS compliant financial results for the preceding quarter and previous year ended March 31, 2016is not mandatory. For the quarter ending September 30, 2016, submission of Ind-AScompliant financial results and Balance Sheet for the previous year ended March 31, 2016 is not mandatory. However, in case the entities intend to submit these results, the same may be without limited review or audit.
(iv) In such cases, the listed entities shall disclose with due prominence that the Ind-AS compliant financial results, pertaining to the relevant periods of the previous year as mentioned in (ii) and (iii) above, as applicable, have not been subjected to limited review or audit. However, the management has exercised necessary due diligence to ensure that the financial results provide a true and fair view of its affairs.
(v) The format of Balance Sheet for the Half-Yearly ended September 30, 2016 shall be as per the format for Balance Sheet (excluding notes and detailed sub-classifications) as prescribed in Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
02 July 2016
Bank of Baroda Concurrent Auditors
30 June 2016
PPF Account Premature Closure : Latest Rules & Eligibility Amount Calculation
June 22, 2016 | by Sreekanth Reddy
Public Provident Fund (PPF) is one of the best Debt oriented Saving options that are available in India. It is also one of the most tax-efficient financial instruments.
PPF Account has a lock-in period of 15 years. A Public Provident Fund (PPF) account gets matured after the completion of 15 years only.
There are certain options for an account holder to make partial withdrawals from PPF. But, a PPF account can be closed prematurely only in the event of the death of the Account holder.
The government has recently issued a notification announcing the latest PPF Account premature closure norms or rules. You can now close your PPF account before the maturity date.
When can I close my PPF Account prematurely?
As per the latest rules, a subscriber of PPF Account shall be allowed premature closure of his/her account (or) account of a minor of whom he/she is the guardian on the below mentioned reasons;
*.A PPF Account can be closed in the event of the death of the Account holder.
*.PPF Account Premature Closure is accepted when the amount is required for the treatment of serious ailments (or) life threatening diseases of the Account holder (self), Spouse, dependent children or parents of the Account holder.
*.PPF Account Premature Closure is also allowed when the amount is required for highereducation of the Account Holder(subscriber/self)or minor account holder.
*.Kindly note that you can close PPF account prematurely only if your account has completed FIVE Financial Years.(This rule is not applicable in case of‘death’ of the account holder.)
*.If the reason for Premature closure of PPF account is ‘medical treatment’, you have to produce supporting documents from competent medical authority.
*.If the reason for premature closure of PPF a/c is ‘higher education’, you have to produce fee bills and documents confirming admission in a recognized institute of higher education in India or abroad(foreign country).
*.Another important point is,a penalty of 1%is deducted from the applicable interest rates on the deposits held in the PPF account. This is applicable on the deposits from the date of opening of the PPF account till the date of premature closure of PPF account.
25 June 2016
CBDT CLARIFICATION ON TCS PROVISION
CBDT Circular No. 23/2016 dt. 24 June 2016
In order to curb the cash economy, Finance Act 2016 has amended section 206C of the Income-tax Act to provide that the seller shall collect tax at the rate of one per cent from the purchaser on sale in cash of certain goods or provision of services exceeding two lakh rupees. Subsequent to the amendment, a number of representations were received from various stakeholders with regard to the scope of the provisions and the procedure to be followed in case of the amended provisions of Section 206C of the Act. The Board, after examining the representations of the stakeholders, issued FAQs vide circular.No.22/2016 dated 8th June, 2016. The Board has further decided to clarify the issue as regards applicability of the provisions relating to levy of TCS where the sale consideration received is partly in cash and partly in cheque by issue of an addendum to the above circular in the form of question and answer as under:
Question 1: Whether tax collection at source under section 206C(1D) at the rate of 1% will apply in cases where the sale consideration received is partly in cash and partly in cheque and the cash receipt is less than two lakh rupees.
Answer : No. Tax collection at source will not be levied if the cash receipt does not exceed two lakh rupees even if the sale consideration exceeds two lakh rupees.
Illustration: Goods worth Rs. 5 lakhs is sold for which the consideration amounting to Rs.4 lakhs has been received in cheque and Rs.1 lakh has been received in cash. As the cash receipt does not exceed Rs.2 lakh, no tax is required to be collected at source as per section 206C (1D).
Question 2: Whether tax collection at source under section 206C (1D) will apply only to cash component or in respect of whole of sales consideration.
Answer: Under section 206C (1D), the tax is required to be collected at source on cash component of the sales consideration and not on the whole of sales consideration.
Illustration: Goods worth Rs. 5 lakhs is sold for which the consideration amounting to Rs.2 lakhs has been received in cheque and Rs.3 lakh has been received in cash. Tax is required to be collected under section 206C (1 D) only on cash receipt of Rs.3 lakhs and not on the whole of sales consideration of Rs.5 lakh.
24 June 2016
HUF cannot be a partner but its karta or any individual of HUF can be a partner in a partnership firm in its individual capacity and not the HUF
http://resource.cdn.icai.org/42465clcgc32221.pdf
Krishi Kalyan Cess exemption
No. 35/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 23rd June, 2016
G.S.R. ---(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), read with sub-section (5) of section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts taxable services with respect to which the invoice for the service has been issued on or before the 31st May, 2016, from the whole of Krishi Kalyan Cess leviable thereon, subject to condition that the provision of service has been completed on or before the 31st May, 2016.
[F.No. B-1/21/2016 - TRU]
(Mohit Tiwari)
Under Secretary
23 June 2016
FAQ-Company Name Reservation and Incorporation at Central Registration Centre (CRC)-MCA
FAQ-Company Name Reservation and Incorporation at Central Registration Centre (CRC)-MCA
1. What is Central Registration Centre (CRC)?
The Central Registration Centre (CRC) is an initiative of Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in Government Process Re-engineering (GPR) with the specific objective of providing speedy incorporation related services in line with global best practices.
2. What services are offered by the CRC presently?
CRC is presently tasked to process applications for name availability (INC-1) and forms related to new companies incorporations (INC-2/INC-7/INC-29/INC-22 and DIR-12.
3. How do I apply for a name for a company?
You can use the services of check name availability for first-hand information on whether the proposed name is available and then apply for it in form INC-1 with six alternative names with deferent prefix word or INC-29 (composite Incorporation Form).
4. What do I do if the name applied for is put under resubmission due to the following reasons :
SIMILAR NAME ALREADY EXISTS :
You are requested to read the mail carefully and follow the query. Before resubmitting please recheck the name from name availability option available at MCA website www.mca.gov.in under ‘services’ tab and the Companies Incorporation rules 2014 with six alternative names .
TRADE MARK EXISTS :
You are requested to read the mail carefully and follow the query. Before resubmitting please recheck the details of Trade Marks are available at MCA website www.mca.gov.in
5. How Can I apply for names which includes words like Insurance, Bank, Stock Exchange, Venture Capital, Asset Management, Nidhi, Mutual Fund, Finance, Chits, Investment, Leasing, Hire purchase etc. or any combination thereof?
Please select ‘yes’ in field 14a of INC-1 (Whether the proposed name includes the words such as Insurance, Bank, Stock exchange, Venture Capital, Asset Management, Nidhi, or Mutual Fund etc.) if name has finance or any other indication of finance activity.
In case of INC-29 (Integrated Incorporation Form), if proposed name includes combination of above words, please select ‘yes’ in field 5 (b) (iv).
In respect of section 8 companies, declaration is required to be attached confirming that after Incorporation, all the mandated requirements of the respective Act/regulator, such as IRDA, RBI, SEBI, MCA etc will be complied with.
The above declarations are required to be given in compliance of rule 8 (2) (b) (iii) and (xiii) of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014(as amended).
6. How can I apply for a name if the name of a Trade Mark is included in its proposed name?
Prescribed particulars in E-form INC-1 are required to be filled in field 11 & 12 duly supported by NOC from the Trade Mark owner.
In case of INC-29, Trade Mark details are required to be filled up in field 5(c) of duly supported by NOC from trade mark owner.
The details of Trade Marks are available at MCA Website www.mca.gov.in under Trade Mark link.
7. How can I apply for a name if combination of the proposed name contains only one word of difference with similar prefix of an existing company?
NOC by way of Board resolution from existing company is required to be attached with e-form.
8. How can I apply for a name if prefix of the proposed name is same to the existing company and activity is not mentioned?
This type of name may be allowed when accompanied with NOC by way of board resolution from the existing companies whose name is same.
9. Can I apply for a name which has the word ‘company’ though the proposed company does not fall under the category of a producer company?
Yes. However, an off-line application has to be made to the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Shastri Bhawan, Dr Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110 001. MCA will process the application on case to case basis for necessary approval. On approval of the application a pre-formatted INC-1 or INC-29 (enabling therein the word company in its name) will be forwarded to the applicant through the jurisdictional RoC for filing purposes.
10. Can I apply for a name in INC-1 to incorporate a Section 8 company with the words ‘micro-finance’ in its name?
Yes for this type of name, you can apply along with declaration as per rule 12 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rule, 2014 if, license is issued under section 8. However, Finance activity is under regulatory control of RBI. Hence at the time of filing incorporation documents promoters/director of proposed company are required to give undertaking as per rule 12 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.
11. What are the steps for incorporating a Section 8 Company?
(i) To incorporate a Section 8 company the promoter/applicant has to first submit an application in INC-1 for reserving a name for a section 8 company (Select radio button of “section 8 Company”).
(ii) On the approval of this application for name, he has to file INC-12 with Jurisdictional RoC for obtaining a License. While making an application for License in INC-12, the approved SRN of INC-1 is a pre-requisite. Please refer the field 3 (* Indicate Registrar of companies (ROC) reference number for name approval (Service Request Number (SRN) of Form INC-1) of INC-12.
(iii) On obtaining the License, he may file INC-7 for incorporating the company. While filling INC-7 the relevant approved SRN of INC-1 and License Number obtained through INC-12 has to be filled in relevant fields.
Note: While INC-1/INC-2/INC-7 along with relevant linked forms viz. INC-22 and DIR-12 and INC-29 are processed by the CRC, application for License (INC-12) is processed by the jurisdictional RoC.
12. How many times ‘Resubmission/Pending for User Clarification (PUCL)’ is allowed in INC-1/INC-2/INC-7 and INC-29?
Resubmission/PUCL is allowed only ‘once’ (in aggregate) in respect of INC-1/INC-2 and INC-7. However, Resubmission/PUCL is allowed ‘thrice’ (in aggregate
22 June 2016
CBDT abolishes tax on start ups issuing shares above market value
CBDT abolishes tax on start ups issuing shares above market value
Closely held companies used to issues shares at substantial premium to convert black money into white money without providing any valuation justifying the premium. Thus, the Finance Act, 2012 inserted Section 56(2)(viib) to impose tax on closely held companies receiving consideration for shares in excess of fair market value. Valuations of start ups have fallen sharply, recently, on worries over profitability, growth and intense competition. The Income-Tax Dept. discussed a controversial move to impose tax on those startups under the garb of Section 56(2)(viib) on the ground that their last round of valuation was lower than the first round. This move was likely to upset startups who were already worried over funding issue and falling valuations. Thus, there had been a long standing demand of the industry that the Govt. should either do away such tax on startups or provide a threshold exemption limit. Now the CBDT has abolished such tax on start ups. Any consideration received by start ups from resident persons in excess of fair value of shares shall not be charged to tax as income from other sources under Section 56(2)(viib). Editor's Note : However, this benefit is not available for all startups. Tax exemption is available for only those startups which fulfill the conditions specified in notification of Govt. of India, dated 17-02-2016.
Radical changes in FDI policy regime
Major impetus to job creation and infrastructure: Radical changes in FDI policy regime; Most sectors on automatic route for FDI
Sector/Activity | New Cap and Route |
5.2.7.1.1 (1)Teleports(setting up of up-linking HUBs/Teleports); (2)Direct to Home (DTH);
(3)Cable Networks (Multi System operators (MSOs) operating at National or State or District level and undertaking upgradation of networks towards digitalization and addressability);
(4)Mobile TV;(5)Headend-in-the Sky Broadcasting Service(HITS)
5.2.7.1.2 Cable Networks (Other MSOs not undertaking upgradation of networks towards digitalization and addressability and Local Cable Operators (LCOs))
|
100%
Automatic
|
Infusion of fresh foreign investment, beyond 49% in a company not seeking license/permission from sectoral Ministry, resulting in change in the ownership pattern or transfer of stake by existing investor to new foreign investor, will require FIPB approval
|
The Income Tax Central Action Plan 2016-17 talks of blocking of PAN
1. Pan Blocking shall be after due notice
PAN to be block after due notice to the tax defaulters.
2. PAN blocking shall deprive defaulters from filing their income tax returns
PAN of tax defaulters shall be be blocked in the system, in a such a way that these defaulters would not be allowed to file their Return of Income.
3. PAN blocking to deprive defaulters benefit of carry forward of losses
Blocking of PAN would mean that defaulters cannot avail the benefit of carry forward of Business Loss and Losses under other heads where filing of Return of Income u/s. 139(1) is mandatory.
4. Blocked PAN to be shared with CIBIL
List of such Blocked PANs can be shared with credit rating agency like CIBIL & Banks, so that these defaulters are not sanctioned any loans or overdraft facility by Public Sector Banks, as the same would become NPAs.
5. Withdraw of facility like LPG etc.
Ministry of Finance can be suggested to withdraw facility like LPG Subsidy etc. which are directly credited in to the Bank A/cs, for the said defaulters i.e. Disincentive to be a tax defaulter.
6. Blocking registration of immovable properties
List of blocked PANs can be circulated to Registrar of Properties with a request for not allowing any registration of immovable properties
19 June 2016
CBDT notifies tax exemption on investments above fair market rate for startups
*CBDT notifies tax exemption on investments above fair market rate for startups*
In a major incentive, startups can now issue shares to investors at higher than fair value without worrying about tax consequences.
In a major incentive, startups can now issue shares to investors at higher than fair value without worrying about tax consequences.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the much awaited tax exemption on investments above fair market rate for startups.
"The exemption provided to startups from the 'rigour' of section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act has been long awaited," Amit Maheshwari, Partner Ashok Maheshwaryand Associates LLP, said.
The effect of the CBDT's notification is that in case a startup gets investment from resident angel investors, family offices or funds which were not registered as venture capital funds, it will not be taxed even if the investment is made in excess to the fair value.
"It has been a long standing industry demand to abolish this Angel tax," Maheshwari said.
A startup is a company in which the public are not "substantially interested" and conforms to certain conditions as prescribed by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) in February this year.
Under Indian tax law, if an Indian company receives share subscription amount from an Indian resident which exceeds the fair value of shares, then the excess amount is taxed as income of the Indian company, said Rajesh H Gandhi, Partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP.
"The notification now exempts startups from this rigorous provision. This is a welcome relaxation and would ensure that startups can issue shares to investors at higher than fair value without worrying about any tax consequences," Gandhi said.
A similar exemption already exists for Venture Capital Funds (VCFs).
Maheshwari said this Angel tax still poses threat to earlier investments which could be perceived as being overvalued in light of the declining valuations globally and in India.
Last week, the DIPP has launched a portal and mobile app through which startups can gather all latest updates on various notifications, circulars issued by various departments and different funding agencies.
In January, Prime Minister Narendra Modihad unveiled a slew of incentives to boost startup businesses, offering them a tax holiday and inspector raj-free regime for three years, capital gains tax exemption and Rs 10,000 crore corpus to fund them.
Source: ET
18 June 2016
Sectoral impact of likely passage of GST Bill
*Automobile*
*2w,Small Cars, CVs – Hero, Bajaj, TVS, Eicher, AL, Maruti*
Currently, the total tax outgo is ~27% (Excise + VAT + CST). A Standard rate of 18% would lead to a ~9% reduction in vehicle prices thereby stimulating demand. OEMs would benefit largely from savings on logistics and warehousing related costs and a simplified tax maintenance structure.
*Large Cars – M&M*
Currently, M&M’s total tax outgo in the UV segment is ~45% (excise + VAT + CST). Luxury cars are recommended to be taxed at higher/demerit tax rate of 40%. UV prices are therefore, likely to reduce by ~5%. We see very little possibility of the SUV segment taxed at a standard rate of 18%, which if happens, can reduce prices by ~27%. Large carmakers would again benefit largely from savings on logistics and warehousing related costs and a simplified tax maintenance structure.
*Tractors – M&M, Escorts*
Tractors is completely exempted from excise and pays an exempted rate of 4% on VAT. As such total tax outgo (including CST) would be ~6%. Note that as tractors is exempt from excise, OEMs currently receive no MODVAT benefit, leading to an indirect excise duty of ~7% and hence a total tax outgo of ~13%. Tractors are likely to be taxed at the ‘Low’ GST rate of 12%, thereby keeping product prices unchanged.
*Auto Ancillaries*
*Batteries – Exide, Amara Raja*
Other players with vast unorganized segments in the replacement market
GST implementation is expected to bring the unorganized players in the tax net – this should reduce the price gap between organized and unorganized players. Battery industry, with ~40% of the replacement market still unorganized, and is likely to benefit from the same and we expect organized players to gain market share. Other smaller auto ancs, catering to replacement market and competing with the unorganized segment are likely to similarly benefit.
*Building materials*
*Tiles – Kajaria*
Currently unorganised sector (~50% of the industry) benefits from tax evasion and lower tax rates at 18% vs current duty of 25-27% paid by the organised players 25-27% will reduce the gap between organised and organized
*Plywood – Centuryply*
Currently, unorganised sector (~75% of the industry) imports raw material without paying duty and final goods are sold without any duty.
*Cement*
Though, 18% tax rate will be lower than what the companies are paying currently (~24.5% excise and VAT), we believe that the companies will pass on the benefits to consumers as demand continues to remain weak. The sector will benefit only when the pricing power is strong in the hands of manufacturers.
*Consumer Durables*
*Symphony*
Large unorganised sector in the air cooler industry (~85% of total market).
The unorganized segment of the consumer durables segment have been evading the indirect taxes for the past many years. The introduction of GST will bring them within the ambit of indirect taxes and would most likely impact their competitive advantage in terms of pricing. The narrowing of the price differential between the organised and unorganised players would help the organised players increase their market share.
*Consumer and Retail Sector*
*FMCG Staples*
*HUL, Colgate, Britannia, GSK Consumer, Nestle, Dabur, Emami, Marico, Godrej Cons*
*Building Products*
*Asian Paints, Berger, Havells, Pidilite, HSIL*
§ All consumer companies will stand to gain with respect to supply chain and logistic.
§ Indirect tax rate will come down to (as per recommendations to possibly 18%) which would lead to higher purchasing power.
§ More players to come under tax net. Thus, competitiveness of organized players to further improve.
§ In Categories, which have high pricing power, reduction might not be as much and hence, the benefits will flow down.
*Fashion Retail*
*Shoppers Stop*
Retailers will benefit from reduced logistics related costs
*Jewellery Retail*
*PC Jeweller, Titan*
· Jewelry retailers too, will benefit from reduced logistics costs
· However, a higher rate on precious metals and gold could impact demand
*Infrastructure*
*Sadbhav Engineering*
*IL &FS Transportation*
Implementation of e-permit/e-tolling systems, post GST, will help manufacturers save on logistics costs by reducing travel time, reducing the need for warehouses in multiple states and the need for buffer inventory
*Media*
*Dish Tv & PVR*
§ Dish TV: The company currently pays ~22% tax on revenues (assuming E-tax rate of 7.5% of revenue) and 4% as special additional duty (SAD). With GST implementation, total tax outgo will reduce depending on the final GST rate (we have done scenario analysis in table below). Further, SAD will also get subsumed with GST implementation. At 18% GST rate, Dish TV would have margin expansion 400bps. We have not assumed 1% additional inter-state movement surcharge as there is no clarity on the same.
§ PVR: The company currently pays 22% E-Tax on gross ticket sales, 7-8% VAT on F&B sales, service tax on inputs (rentals, maintenance and others). With GST implementation total tax outgo will reduce depending on the final GST rate (we have done scenario analysis in table below). Primary benefit to PVR would be offset of service tax paid on inputs (~Rs600-650mn in FY16), this amount will further increase as service tax rate will also increase from 14.5% to 18% (in GST regime). At 18% GST rate, PVR would see EBITDA upgrade of 22% on our current assumption Rs4010mn for FY17E, implying 400-500bps margin expansion.
Ten Features that distinguish the NCLT from CLB
The constitution of these Tribunals marks the dissolution of the Company Law Board (CLB).
Fourteen years after its introduction in the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, and after several rounds of litigation, the Government has finally constituted these tribunals. The primary objective of these tribunals is to provide simpler, speedier and more accessible dispute resolution mechanism for company related disputes, by unburdening the courts.
Provided hereunder is a brief summary of the differences between the CLB and the NCLT.
*1. Number of Benches*
While the CLB was functioning with only five benches, the NCLT will commence action with eleven benches. It is expected to eventually have benches across each state in India.
*2. Jurisdiction*
While provisions relating to mergers, restructuring and winding-up have not been notified yet, the NCLT, once fully functional, will consolidate the corporate jurisdiction of the
CLB;
Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction;
Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and;
Jurisdiction and powers relating to winding up, restructuring and other such provisions, currently vested in the High Courts.
Once notified, the provisions relating to mergers, restructuring and winding up will no longer be under the jurisdiction of the High Court.
*3. Amicus curiae*
The Draft National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2013 (Draft Rules) enable the NCLT to appoint Amicus Curiae for opinion on various specialised legal issues.
*4. Other professionals allowed to represent*
Until now, Company Secretaries, Chartered Accountants, Cost Accountants could represent their clients only before the CLB, the scope of which was limited. The Draft Rules enable other professionals to represent their clients in matters pertaining to mergers/ winding-up before the NCLT.
*5. Class action suits*
With the constitution of the NCLT, shareholders and creditors can now file class action suits against the company for breaching the provisions of the Act.
While shareholders have always been allowed to protest against the wrong doings of the management, class action suits takes this a step further. The key difference between oppression, mismanagement (Sections 241-244) and class action suits (Section 245) can be summed up in the following points:
Under Section 245, members as well as deposit holders can file an application as opposed to only member;
Application can be filed, in addition to company and its statutory appointees, against audit firms and any other independent consultants;
Application can be filed for future activities as well in addition to current or past activities.
*6. Dedicated online portal*
The Draft Rules introduce a ‘dedicated online portal’ through which all the parties or central or state government agencies and local government bodies may electronically send and receive documents to or from the NCLT and make required payments.
*7. Electronic filing*
As per the Draft Rules, electronic filing and serving of Tribunal documents shall be mandatory except as provided otherwise, with effect from the date to be notified in the official gazette
*8. Members of the Technical Committee and Selection Committee*
In the NCLT, only officers holding ranks of Secretaries or Additional Secretaries can be considered for appointment as technical members. While the CLB did not have a selection committee, the selection committee for the NCLT comprises of four members including the Chief Justice of India, who will have a casting vote.
*9. Appeals*
Appeals from the NCLT will go the NCLAT, and thereafter with the Supreme Court. The High Courts have been eliminated from the chain of appeals.
*10. Ousting of Civil Court jurisdiction*
Under the old regime, there was no express provision ousting the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts, and various judicial pronouncements have time and again reiterated the requirement of an express provision for ousting Civil Court jurisdiction.
Putting an end to the debate, Section 430 the Act expressly ousts the jurisdiction of Civil Courts.
16 June 2016
Simplified Procedure-Form 15G-H
SI. No
|
Date of ending of the quarter of the financial year
|
Due Date
|
1.
|
30th June
|
15th July of the financial year
|
2.
|
30th September
|
15th October of the financial year
|
3.
|
31st December
|
15th January of the financial year
|
4.
|
31st March
|
30th April of the financial year immediately following the financial year in which declaration is made.
|
15 things you should know about Model GST Law
Don't stress about the future, it hasn't arrived yet
Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors
Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...
-
Drafts of tax accounting standard on construction contracts, government grants issued The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has invited c...
-
After the ICAI regional council and central council elections , there is an anxious waiting period for resul...
-
Here is the final list of candidates won from WIRC for Central Council: Sr. No. Name of Candidate 1 CA. Adukia Rajkumar Satyanarayan 2 CA...