27 September 2013

Audit Filling Extension-Press release

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes


PRESS RELEASE

26th September, 2013

      
          It has come to the notice of the  CBDT that may assessees who are required to file their income tax returns by September 30, 2013 are finding it difficult to upload the report of Audit electronically as prescribed under the proviso to sub-rule(2) of Rule 12 of the IT Rules for the Assessment Year 2013-14.  Therefore, the CBDT has decided to extend the time for furnishing the report of Audit electronically till October 31, 2013.  However, the assessees are required to file the report of Audit manually with the jurisdictional Assessing Officer by the prescribed due date, i.e. September 30, 2013.  The assessees are also required to file their returns of income electronically by the prescribed due date, i.e. September 30, 2013.
  


(Rekha Shukla)
Commissioner of Income Tax
(Media & Technical Policy Co-ordination)
  Official Spokesperson, CBDT


18 September 2013

Safe Harbour Rules Finalized

Press Information Bureau 
Government of India
Ministry of Finance 
18-September-2013 15:49 IST
Safe Harbour Rules Finalized after Considering Comments of Various Stake Holders ; Rules to be Applicable for 5 Assessment Years Beginning from Assessment Year 2013-14 

            Section 92CB of the Income-tax Act provides for framing of safe harbour rules. The determination of arms length price u/s 92C or 92CA of the Act is subject to these safe harbour rules. The definition of safe harbour rule provided in section 92CB means circumstances in which the Income-tax Authority shall accept the transfer price declared by the assessee.

            The draft safe harbour rules were placed in public domain along with Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Press Release on 14.08.2013 seeking comments of various stake holders. The comments received from various stake holders have been considered and necessary modifications have been made to the draft rules. The finalized safe harbour rules are being notified separately. The salient feature of the modifications incorporated in the final safe harbour rules are:-

(i)                 The safe harbour rules shall be applicable for 5 assessment years beginning from assessment year 2013-14.

(ii)               An assessee can opt for the safe harbour regime for a period of his choice but not exceeding 5 assessment years. This option can be exercised by filing of Form 3CEFA which has been prescribed in the rules.

(iii)             In case of transactions in the nature of routine ITES and ITS activities  the  earlier ceiling of Rs 100 crore has been removed. Transactions upto Rs. 500 crore have been provided safe harbour margin of 20% and transaction above Rs.500 crore  have been provided safe harbour margin of 22% .Similarly, the ceiling of Rs. 100 crore provided for transactions in the nature of corporate guarantee has been removed. The Safe harbour would be available in case of transactions above Rs 100 crore only if the wholly owned subsidiary has been rated to be of adequate to highest safety by a rating agency registered with SEBI. The safe harbour margin for such transactions above Rs 100 crore has been reduced to 1.75% of the amount guaranteed.

(iv)             The definition of Knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) has been rationalized to provide reasonable distinction from routine business process outsourcing activity. The safe harbour operating margin has been reduced from 30% to 25%. Further the ceiling in respect of KPO transactions has been removed.

(v)               The safe harbour provisions would be available only if the assessee satisfies the eligibility conditions provided in the rules and in respect of such international transactions which are eligible for safe harbour as provided in the rules.

(vi)             The rules provide for a time bound procedure for determination of the eligibility of the assessee and the international transactions. Any rejection of the option exercised by the assessee shall be by way of a reasoned order passed after hearing the assessee. The assessee shall have a right to file an objection with the Commissioner against adverse finding regarding the eligibility. The Commissioner shall thereafter decide about the validity of the option exercised by the assessee.

(vii)           In case the action is not taken by any of the authorities within the following time lines  provided in the rules the option exercised by the assessee shall be treated as valid,:-

(a)    the reference by the Assessing Officer (AO) to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) shall be made within a period of two months from the end of the month in which Form No.3CEFA is received by him;
(b)   the TPO shall pass an order determining the validity of the option exercised by the assessee within a period of two months from the end of the month in which reference from AO is received by him;
(c)    the Commissioner shall pass an order on the objection received from the assessee within a period of two months from the end of the month in which the objection has been received by him.

(viii)         Once the option exercise by the assessee is held to be valid it shall remain so for the period opted unless the assessee voluntarily opts out of safe harbour regime by furnishing a statement to this effect to the Assessing Officer.

(ix)             The assessee shall be required to submit a statement regarding the quantum of international transaction, its nature and the operating margins or rate of interest or commission for the relevant assessment years covered under the period for which safe harbour is option is exercised.

(x)               The option exercised by the assessee can be held invalid in an assessment year following the initial assessment year only if there is change in the facts and circumstances relating to the eligibility of the assessee or of the international transaction. However, such withdrawal shall be done only after providing opportunity of being heard to the assessee.  The assessee has a right to file his objection with the Commissioner, who shall after hearing the assessee determine the validity of the option.

*****
DSM/MJPS/ka


13 September 2013

Alert on ITR Vs


Notification for Extension of date for receipt of ITR-Vs in CPC, Bengaluru, for the cases of AY 2012-13 and 2011-12 received in e-filed in FY 2012-13

12 September 2013

Alert on Advance Tax

Ministry of Finance12-September, 2013 15:26 IST
Payment of Quarterly Advance Tax on or before 15th September, 2013; All Designated Branches of Authorized Banks to Function on 14th and 15th September, 2013 (Saturday & Sunday) 
All designated branches of authorized banks have been asked to function on 14th and 15th September, 2013 (Saturday & Sunday) to accept advance tax payments. If any tax payer fails to pay the advance tax on 14th/15th September, 2013, then he/she can make the payment even on 16th September, 2013. 

Payment of Quarterly Advance Tax on or before 15th September, 2013 by the tax payers is a statutory requirement. All such tax payers who are liable to pay advance tax must make payments in the designated branches of the banks authorized to accept tax payments. 

*****


DSM/MJPS/ka 
(Release ID :99304)

10 September 2013

Draft Rules under Companies Act,2013

This e-platform for receiving suggestions on draft rules under the Companies Act 2013 has been developed in a user friendly and interactive manner, and will facilitate collation and analysis of suggestions/comments received on the draft rules. Stakeholders are requested to use this platform for providing their suggestions and comments on the draft rules.

30 days left for giving Suggestions on Rules
PFA

06 September 2013

Revised Form 15CA-15CB

The CBDT has issued Twelfth Amendment Rules on August 5, 2013 vide Notification No. 58/2013 whereby it amended Rule 37BB and prescribed new Forms 15CA and 15CB. However, within a couple of weeks, the CBDT issued one more amendment to Rule 37BB in suppression of earlier notification (amendment rules).
The new Forms provide for two categories (.i.e., Part A and Part B of Form 15CA) on which remittances are required to be reported. It provides that only taxable remittances (including salary or interest) are required to be reported in Form 15CA.
Before the Twelfth Amendment Rules, the payers were required to submit the remittance details in Form 15CA and they were also required to obtain certificate under Form 15CB, notwithstanding whether the payee was liable to tax in India or not? Then Twelfth Amendment Rules extended some relaxation and provided immunity from obtaining certificate under Form 15CB for certain remittances. Now Fourteenth Amendment Rules provide exemption from filing of Form 15CA if remittance is not chargeable to tax in the hands of payee, it also provides immunity from obtaining Form 15CB if the taxable remittances are covered by Part A of new Form 15CA.

05 September 2013

Statement by Dr. Raghuram Rajan on taking office on September 4, 2013

Date : 04 Sep 2013
Dr. Raghuram Rajan assumes charge as Governor, RBI
1

Dr. Raghuram Rajan assumed charge as the 23rd Governor of the Reserve Bank of India on September 4, 2013. Prior to this, he was the Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry of Finance, Government of India and the Eric J. Gleacher Distinguished Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago's Booth School. Between 2003 and 2006, Dr. Rajan was the Chief Economist and Director of Research at the International Monetary Fund.
Dr. Rajan's research interests are in banking, corporate finance, and economic development, especially the role finance plays in it. He has co-authored Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists with Luigi Zingales in 2003. He then wrote Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy, for which he was awarded the Financial Times-Goldman Sachs prize for best business book in 2010.
Dr. Rajan is a member of the Group of Thirty. He was the President of the American Finance Association in 2011 and is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In January 2003, the American Finance Association awarded Dr. Rajan the inaugural Fischer Black Prize for the best finance researcher under the age of 40. The other awards he has received include the global Indian of the year award from NASSCOM in 2011, the Infosys prize for the Economic Sciences in 2012, and the Center for Financial Studies-Deutsche Bank Prize for financial economics in 2013.
Born on February 3, 1963, Dr. Rajan is married to Radhika and has two children.
Alpana Killawala
Principal Chief General Manager
Press Release : 2013-2014/489


03 September 2013

Customs Baggage Regulations,2013



90/2013 Dated 29-8-2013 - Customs - Non Tariff - Customs Baggage Declaration Regulations, 2013




[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary,
Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Notification No. 90/2013-Customs (N.T.)
New Delhi
Dated the 29th August, 2013
G.S.R.     - In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 81 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following regulations, namely:—
1. Short title. - These regulations may be called the Customs Baggage Declaration Regulations, 2013.
2. Extent of application. - These regulations shall apply to baggage including any package comprised therein of the passengers coming to India. These regulations will come into effect w.e.f. 1st January, 2014.
3. Method of Declaration of Baggage. - All passengers who come to India shall declare their accompanied baggage in Form I appended to this regulation.
[F. No. 520/13/2013-Cus.VI]
(S.C. Ganger)
Under Secretary to the Government of India


01 September 2013

CIRCULAR ON TDS MISMATCH

CBDT Instruction Regarding Unmatched TDS Challans In Form 26AS

August 31st, 2013
Pursuant to the judgement of the Delhi High Court in Court on Its Own Motion vs. UOI 352 ITR 273, the CBDT has issued Instruction No. 11 of 2013 dated 27.08.2013 stating that where the report by the deductor in the TDS statement are not found available in the OLTAS database resulting in TDS mismatch, the CPC(TDS)/ AOs(TDS) shall immediately issue letters to the deductors, in whose case TDS challans are unmatched, with a view to verify and correct these challans. If necessary, the deductors may be asked to file correction statements, as per the procedure laid down and necessary follow up action be taken. It has been directed that the task should be completed by 31st December 2013 for FY 2012-13 in the case of CPC (TDS) and FYs 2011-12 & earlier in case of AOs (TDS)

31 August 2013

HUF-LLP PARTNER

SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 - PARTNERS - WHETHER HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY (HUF)/ITS KARTA CAN BECOME PARTNER/DESIGNATED PARTNER (DP) IN LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP (LLP)
GENERAL CIRCULAR NO. 13/2013 [F.NO. 1/13/2012-CL-V], DATED 29-7-2013
It has come to the notice of the Ministry that some Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs)/Kartas of such families are applying to become partner/ Designated partner (DP) in LLPs and a question has arisen whether a 'HUF' or a karta can be allowed to do so. The matter has been examined in consultation with Ministry of Law.
2. As per section 5 of LLP Act, 2008 only an individual or body corporate may be a partner in a Limited Liability Partnership. A HUF cannot be treated as a body corporate for the purposes of LLP Act, 2008. Therefore, a HUF or its karta can not become designated partner in LLP.
3. This issues with the approval of Secretary, MCA

ST Return Due Date Extended


ORDER NO 4/2013-Service Tax, Dated : August 30, 2013
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule(4) of rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the Central Board of Excise & Customs hereby extends the date of submission of the Form ST-3 for the period from 1st October 2012 to 31st March 2013, from 31st August, 2013 to 10thSeptember, 2013.
The circumstances of a special nature, which have given rise to this extension of time, are as follows:
"Difficulties have been faced by assessees in uploading the offline utilities".
F.No.137/99/2011-Service Tax
Himani Bhayana
Under Secretary (Service Tax) 
Central Board of Excise and Customs


26 August 2013

NO TDS ON SERVICE TAX PORTION


ATDS breather on service tax portion


The Rajasthan High Court, in the case of Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure Development Project, ruled that no tax need be withheld under Section 194J on the service tax payable on professional/ technical fees.
Interestingly, the Central Board of Direct Taxes had in an earlier circular held that the scope of withholding tax under Section 194J includes 'any sum' by way of professional/ technical services, and withholding tax applies on the service tax component as well.
However, the High Court ruled that if service tax is payable in addition to professional/ technical fees under the contract, the withholding tax will be restricted to the fees, thereby highlighting that examination of contract terms is imperative.
This ruling may also be relevant in the context of other similarly worded withholding tax provisions.

22 August 2013

Very Important Alert on e Filing of Tax Audit Report


Dear Members,

Please note that there is clear instructions from Income-tax Department wherever there is requirement in the Form to be submitted a signed copy of document by an Assessee/ CA as an attachment, upload the scanned copy of the same documents.

Please see the instruction in ITD website.

Please adhere to the instruction while e filing the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss while uploading the tax audit report.

10 August 2013

Parliament Passes Companies Bill,2012

Dear Members,

Parliament Passes the Historic Companies Bill 2012

             
The Parliament has passed the historic Companies Bill 2012, moved by Shri Sachin Pilot, Minister of Corporate Affairs. The Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha here today which had already been passed by the Lok Sabha many months ago (in December 2012). Shri Pilot has termed it as a historic day for the country as it will usher in a new era in the Corporate Governance.
The new Companies Bill, on its enactment, will allow the country to have a modern legislation for growth and regulation of corporate sector in India. The existing statute for regulation of companies in the country, viz. the Companies Act, 1956 had been under consideration for quite long for comprehensive revision in view of the changing economic and commercial environment nationally as well as internationally. The new law will facilitate business-friendly corporate regulation, improve corporate governance norms, enhance accountability on the part of corporates/ auditors, raise levels of transparency and protect interests of investors, particularly small investors.
The salient features of the new Companies law are: Business friendly corporate Regulation/ pro-business initiatives; e-Governance Initiatives; Good Corporate Governance and CSR; Enhanced Disclosure norms; Enhanced accountability of Management; Stricter enforcement; Audit accountability; Protection for minority shareholders; Investor protection and activism; Better framework for insolvency regulation; and Institutional structure. Other important features of the Companies Bill, 2012 are:  
(i)   Enhanced Accountability on the part of Companies
(a) In addition to the concept of Independent Directors (IDs) introduced, the provisions in respect of their tenure and liability etc have been provided. Code for IDs provided in a new Schedule to the Bill. Databank for IDs proposed to be maintained by a body/institute notified by the Central Government to facilitate appointment of IDs. (Clauses 149(10); 149(11); 149(7); 150);
(b) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee of the Board proposed in addition to other Committees of the Board viz Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration and Stakeholders Relationship Committee. These committees shall have IDs/non executive directors to bring more independence in Board functioning and for protection of interests of minority shareholders. (Clauses 135, 177 and 178);
(c)  Provisions in respect of vigil mechanism (whistle blowing) proposed to enable a company to evolve a process to encourage ethical corporate behavior, while rewarding employees for their integrity and for providing valuable information to the management on deviant practices. (Clause 177 (9) and 177 (10));
(d)   New provisions suggested for allowing re-opening of accounts in certain cases with due safeguards. (Clause 130 and 131).
(ii)     Audit Accountability:
(a) Rotation of auditors and audit firms being provided for. (Clause 139 (2));
(b) Stricter and more accountable role for auditor being retained. Provisions relating to prohibiting auditor from performing non-audit services revised to ensure independence and accountability of auditor.  (Clause 141 and Clause 144);
(c) National Advisory Committee on Accounting and Auditing Standards (NACAAS) proposed to be renamed as National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with a mandate to ensure monitoring and compliance of accounting and auditing standards and to oversee quality of service of professionals associated with compliance. 
(iii) Facilitating Mergers/ Acquisitions:
Simplified procedure (through confirmation by the  Central Government), laid down for compromise or arrangement including for merger or amalgamation of holding companies  and wholly owned subsidiary (ies), between two or more small companies and for such other class or classes of companies as may be prescribed. This would result into faster decisions on approvals for mergers and amalgamations resulting effective restructuring in companies and growth in the economy. For other companies, such matters would be approved by Tribunal. (Clause 233 and 232).
(iv)   Investor Protection:
(a) Acceptance of deposits from public subject to a more stringent regime. (Clause 76);
(b) Provisions for Class Action Suits revised to provide minimum number of persons who may apply for such suits. Safeguards against misuse of these provisions also being included. (Clause 245).
(v)   National Company Law Tribunal (Tribunal): Keeping in view the Supreme Court's Judgment, on the 11th May, 2010 on the composition and constitution of the Tribunal, modifications relating to qualification and experience etc of the members of the Tribunal have been made. Appeals from Tribunal shall lie to National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. (Chapter XXVII).
-----------------------------

CBEC on VCES

Dear Members,
The CBEC has issued Circular No. 170/5 /2013 ST dated 08.08.2013 (as attached) clarifying references received by the Board seeking further clarifications as regards the scope and applicability of the VCES Scheme. Some of the issues raised with reference to the Scheme have been clarified by the Board vide circular No. 169/4/2013-ST, dated 13.5.2013. The Union Finance Minister, Mr P. Chidambaram, has also released a booklet containing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 in New Delhi today in the presence of Revenue Secretary, Chairperson and other members of Central Board of Excise & Customs and media.
Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) announced by the Finance Minister in his Budget speech has come into effect on 10 th May, 2013. The objective of the scheme is to encourage disclosure of Tax dues and compliance of Service Tax law by the persons who have not paid service tax dues for the period from Oct, 2007 to Dec, 2012, either on account of ignorance of law or otherwise. On payment of the tax dues relating to the said period there will be complete waiver of interest, penalty and other proceedings/ consequences.

Best Wishes

CA. V.M.V.SUBBA RAO
Chartered Accountant

IndianCAs: Key Highlights of Companies Bill,2012

 

Key Highlights of Companies Bill,2012


  1. Incorporation of a One Person Company has been permitted.
  2. Numbers of permissible members in private company has been raised to 200 as against existing limit of 50 members.
  3. Listed companies shall have at least 1/3rd of the total number of directors as Independent Directors and the Central Government may prescribe the minimum number of Independent Directors for any class of public companies.
  4. Nominee director cannot be regarded as Independent Director.
  5. Maximum term of ID has been restricted to five years at once subject to a maximum of two such terms.
  6. Appointment of at least one woman director on the board of prescribed classes of companies has been made mandatory.
  7. Appointment of at least one director resident in India, i.e. a director who has stayed in India for at least 182 days in the previous calendar year, is made mandatory for all companies. 
  8. Maximum number of directors has been increased from twelve (12) to fifteen (15) directors .Further no Central Government approval is required to increase the maximum no. of directors beyond fifteen(15). Shareholders of companies may do so by passing a special resolution.
  9. A person can hold directorship of up to 20 companies, of which not more than 10 can be public companies.
  10. No listed companies shall appoint: 
            i. an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years, and
           ii. an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years.

    11. Shareholders are at liberty to decide by passing resolution that audit partner and the audit team, be rotated every year

    12. CSR has been made mandatory for a company having net worth of Rs. 500 crore or more, or turnover of Rs.1,000 crore or more or net profit of Rs. 5 crore or more during any
           financial year.

    13. Such company is required to constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the board (CSRC) which shall consist of three or more directors , out of which at least one
           director shall be an independent director.

    14. Such company shall spend, in every financial year, at least 2 % of the average net profits of the company made during three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its              Corporate Social Responsibility Policy (CSRP).

    15. The provision for establishment of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) by the Central Government is another significant feature of the bill.

    16. SFIO is empowered to arrest in respect of certain offence involving fraud.

    17. Changes have also been made to the grounds for winding up a company.

    18. Some other features of the bill include-

          i. Financial year will be uniform for all companies i.e. April-March.

         ii. Restriction on buyback of shares within one year from the last buy back.

         iii. Voting through electronic means.

        iv. Capping director's remuneration at 5% of the net profits of the company.

         v. The concept of Dormant Company has been introduced.

        vi. Special courts for speedy trials.

| Ashwin Nagar | FCA and SAP-Finance & Consolidations |+919833015352
Success is not permanent and failure is not final
 







__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Note: All messages posted by members including me on this group are sent in their personal capacity. No official position held anywhere by them have nothing to do with this email group. The group does   not accept any responsibility with regards to accuracy or the mistakes in the material circulated on this group. Please confirm from your independent source before using the information or material posted on this group.
*************************************************************************
Further, your attention is invited:

The messages on this group are approved only when the moderator finds it of immense importance to the members at general, otherwise, this group is not used for discussion or as discussion forum.
.

__,_._,___

09 August 2013

IndianCAs: The Companies Act, 2012 - Knowledge Sharing [1 Attachment]

 
[Attachment(s) from Ashwin Nagar included below]

Dear Friend,
 
Please find the attached New companies bill, 2012 passed by Rajya sabha yesterday and which was passed in Lok Sabha on 18th Dec, 2012.

Have a happy reading.

Shared by: Viju patel <rajuvijupatel@rediffmail.com>

Thanks,

| Ashwin Nagar | FCA and SAP-Finance & Consolidations |
Success is not permanent and failure is not final
 






__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Ashwin Nagar

1 of 1 File(s)

Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic ()
Recent Activity:
Note: All messages posted by members including me on this group are sent in their personal capacity. No official position held anywhere by them have nothing to do with this email group. The group does   not accept any responsibility with regards to accuracy or the mistakes in the material circulated on this group. Please confirm from your independent source before using the information or material posted on this group.
*************************************************************************
Further, your attention is invited:

The messages on this group are approved only when the moderator finds it of immense importance to the members at general, otherwise, this group is not used for discussion or as discussion forum.
.

__,_._,___

31 July 2013

Extension of due date for filing of Returns of Income from 31.07.2013 to 05.08.2013

Extension of due date for filing of Returns of Income from 31.07.2013 to 05.08.2013.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The due date for filing return of Income has been extended from 31.07.2013 to 05.08.2013.

Case Law on Sec 40(a)(ia)


 Dear Members,

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

CIT vs. Vector Shipping Services (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court)

S. 40(a)(ia) disallowance applies only to amounts "payable" as of 31st March and not to amounts already "paid" during the year. Merilyn Shipping (SB) approved

The assessee engaged Mercator Lines Ltd to perform ship management work on behalf of the assessee for which it paid an amount of Rs. 1.17 crore. The assessee claimed that the amount paid by it to Mercator was a 'reimbursement of salaries' and that as Mercator had deducted TDS on the payments made by it to the employees, the assessee was not required to deduct TDS. The AO disagreed and disallowed the entire payment u/s 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim and held that no TDS was required to be deducted on a reimbursement. It also relied on Merilyn Shipping and Transport Ltd 136 ITD 23 (SB) where it was held that s. 40(a)(ia) applied only to amounts that were "payable" as at the end of the year and not to amounts that had already been "paid" during the year. On appeal by the department, HELD dismissing the appeal:
The revenue cannot take any benefit from the observations made by the Special Bench of the Tribunal in Merilyn Shipping and Transport Ltd 136 ITD 23 (SB) to the effect that s. 40 (a) (ia) was introduced by the Finance Act, 2004 w.e.f. 1.4.2005 with a view to augment the revenue through the mechanism of tax deduction at source. S. 40(a)(ia) was brought on the statute to disallow the claim of even genuine and admissible expenses of the assessee under the head 'Income from Business and Profession' in case the assessee does not deduct TDS on such expenses. The default in deduction of TDS would result in disallowance of expenditure on which such TDS was deductible. On facts, tax was deducted as TDS from the salaries of the employees paid by Mercator Lines and the circumstances in which such salaries were paid by Mercator Lines for the assessee were sufficiently explained. It is to be noted that for disallowing expenses from business and profession on the ground that TDS has not been deducted, the amount should be payable and not which has been paid by the end of the year.
Contrast with the view in Crescent Export Syndicate (Cal) & Sikandarkhan N. Tunvar (Guj). But see Vegetable Products 88 ITR 192 (SC) where it was held that in the case of doubt the view in favour of the assessee should be followed

ITR Trouble Shooting Guide


Trouble Shooting Guide for Problems in accessing www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in - (31-07-2013)

TROUBLE SHOOTING GUIDE FOR PROBLEMS IN ACCESSING
WWW.INCOMETAXINDIAEFILING.GOV.IN

Since ICAI was reported of the difficulties being faced while uploading the income tax returns in the e-filing website, the matter was taken up with appropriate authorities. The authorities have shared a Trouble Shooting guide for problems in accessing the www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in with us with a request to spread the message. Members interested may please click on the link below.
TROUBLE SHOOTING GUIDE

Considering the difficulties being faced by assessees at large, ICAI had requested CBDT to extend the due date of e-filing return of income. Accordingly, the date has been extended to 05.08.2013.

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors

Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...