SIRC: Central Council 1st Preference Vote

Rank	Name	City	1st Pref Votes
1	SEKAR G	CHENNAI	2195
2	VENKATESWARLU J	HYDERABAD	1855
3	BABU ABRAHAM KALLIVAYALIL	KOCHI	1679
4	RAGHU K	BANGALORE	1661
5	MURALI V	CHENNAI	1409
6	SANTHANA KRISHNAN S	CHENNAI	1370
7	MADHUKAR NARAYAN HIREGANGE	BANGALORE	1245
8	RAVI SANKAR L	CHENNAI	1000
9	DEVARAJA REDDY M	HYDERABAD	974
10	RAJENDRA KUMAR P	CHENNAI	911
11	SHANMUKHA SUNDARAM K	COIMBATORE	849
12	AMBIKA S Ms.	HYDERABAD	534
13	SATYANARAYANA G V V	VIJAYAWADA	427
14	BALACHANDRA PRABHU S B	KOCHI	340
15	RAMAKRISHNAN R	BANGALORE	292
16	SRIVATSAN S	TIRUCHIRAPALLI	270
17	VENKATRAM C	HYDERABAD	246
18	SRIKANTH S	CHENNAI	244
19	SABU THOMAS	THIRUVANANTHAPURAM	218
20	VEDANTHA RAMANUJAM J	CHENNAI	186
21	SUNEEL KUMAR APPAJI	HYDERABAD	116
22	VENUGOPAL SWAMI B	HYDERABAD	92
23	SRINIVAS K J D	VISAKHAPATNAM	26

Courtesy:  GOPAL KRISHNA RAJU

SIRC Quota declared

The Quota for Regional Council is 1205.

The Quota for Central Council is 2268.

Members Feedback on election-1

 

Mail from P. Sriganesh 

Dear CA friend,

 

I will be happy if you could forward this mail to all

 

Though I was in Mumbai I did not vote this time for anyone in my professional career of 35+ years.

This arose out of my resolve not to vote for anyone who either/and/or called me, sent SMS, referred through other CAs, sent mailers in the form of books and reports, sent mail with recommendations from other CAs, sent greetings SMS for Diwali etc. However, the worst was calls from staff members of the contestant's firm requesting to cast vote.

Out of the list sent by ICAI not a single contestant could meet my criteria. I hope and wish that the members who have got elected to put a stop to this practise of "communication harassment". You will find that if a member is travelling (even if within India), he/she cannot vote from any other centre unless ICAI is informed well in advance. I found this to my dismay during the last election.

India is an Information technology super power that has electronic voting for political elections and e-voting through NSDL for companies. The sad part is ICAI and its members who serve corporate clients and are aware of NSDL e-voting cannot implement it for ICAI elections.

I request you to impress upon the elected members to bring in the following suggested guidelines for future elections.

1. The mail from ICAI conveys all that a member wants to know about his fellow member who wishes to serve the fraternity by getting elected and no further communication is required.

2. No additional methods are required to impress upon the well-educated and professionally qualified CA's.

3. None of the staff members should be deployed for election work.

4. Last but not least, ICAI should adopt the e-voting methodology followed by Companies and save cost of running polling booths and let members vote from anywhere they like.

Trust my mail will be taken positively and action will be taken by ICAI before the next election.

Warm Regards

Sriganesh B.Sc.; F.C.A.; F.C.S.

Some Interesting facts of WIRC election

• Two sitting regional council members lost this election. Ashok Jain, and Chandrkant Pawar.
• All Shah won the election. Hardik Shah, Shardul Shah, Julfesh Shah, Shruti Shah, Priyam Shah, except Mahesh Shah from Vasai. And all these Shah coming from different region.
• Mumbai lost one seat to Ahmedabad. They had five seats and got four only back. Shrinivas Joshi, Durgesh Kabra, Sanjeev Lallan, and N C Hegde vacated their seat and Ahsok Jain lost. These are filled by Sushrut Chitale (replaced Shrinivas Joshi), Priti Savla (replaced Sanjeev Lalan), and Sandeep Jain (replaced Ashok Jain). In place of Durgesh Kabra and  N C Hegde, only Mahesh Madkholkar won from Mumbai (considering Thane too as part of Grater Mumbai). I have put replacement based on the common friends and groups following of the candidates in my view. So finally Mumbai lost one seat to Ahmedabad and Subodh Kedia is in.
• Aurgangabad and Thane branch got their representative first time in regional council. Girish Kulkarni (Aurangabad), and Thane got two Priti Savla and Mahesh. 
• Nashik branch lost its representative to Aurangabad. Nagpur branch had two members last time and this time they have lost one, whereas Ahmedabad and Pune branch had two members last time has gained one each and now they have now three representative in the regional council.
• First time in WIRC there two female members. The lady luck has smiled on Priti Savla and Shruti Shah. And courtesy their loosing lady colleagues. Each elimination of a female candidate has given a large chunk to the surviving female candidate and that kept them move ahead.

Who got the highest Second Preference Votes

Here is the list of highest second preference vote getters. Look at Shruti's mind boggling performance. She started with 516 and got more than double seconds and went up to 14th rank. I never seen her chances initially, but she did wonders. Many congratulations!!

Sr. No.	Rank	Name	City	2nd Pref	1st Pref	Total
1	14	Shruti Shah	Mumbai	781	516	1297
2	12	Girish Kulkarni	Aurangabad	622	775	1397
3	16	Sandeep Jain	Mumbai	595	596	1191
4	23	Lalit Laxminarayan Bajaj	Bhayandar	487	509	996
5	13	Satyanarayan Mundada	Pune	486	819	1305
6	10	Vishnu Kumar Agarwal	Mumbai	483	914	1397
7	15	Anil Bhandari  Satyanarayan	Mumbai	471	772	1243
8	7	Hardik Shah	Surat	465	932	1397
9	19	Subodh Kedia	Ahmedabad	445	686	1131
10	18	Dilip Apte Moreshwar	Pune	438	698	1136
11	21	Sarvesh Joshi	Pune	415	661	1076
12	11	Julfesh Shah	Nagpur	397	1000	1397
13	22	Mahesh Madkholkar	Thane	381	682	1063
14	17	Neel Majithia	Mumbai	364	816	1180
15	25	Vandana Dodhia	Mumbai	339	574	913

Who got the second preference of Pawar?

Sr. No.	Name	City	2nd Pref
1	Girish Kulkarni	Aurangabad	261
2	Satyanarayan Mundada	Pune	92
3	Sarvesh Joshi	Pune	75
4	Dilip Apte Moreshwar	Pune	61
5	Shruti Shah	Mumbai	51
6	Anil Bhandari  Satyanarayan	Mumbai	40
7	Mahesh Madkholkar	Thane	27
8	Sandeep Jain	Mumbai	20
9	Lalit Laxminarayan Bajaj	Bhayandar	18
10	Neel Majithia	Mumbai	8
11	Priyam Shah	Ahmedabad	5
12	Subodh Kedia	Ahmedabad	2