|
06 September 2012
Key recommendations of expert committee on GAAR
GAAR Comments Invited
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
The Committee, chaired by Dr. Parthasarathi Shome, has submitted its draft report after analysis of the GAAR provisions and noting the concerns expressed by various shareholders. The draft report has recommended certain amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961; guidelines to be prescribed under the Income-tax Rules, 1962; circular to clarify GAAR provisions along with illustrations; and other measures to improve tax administration specifically oriented towards GAAR matters.
The report of the Committee has been uploaded on the Finance Ministry's website (http://finmin.nic.in) for comments from stakeholders and the general public.
The comments and suggestions on the draft report may be submitted by 15th September, 2012 at the email address (jstpl2@nic.in) or by post at the address: Joint Secretary (Tax Policy & Legislation-II), Room No.152, North Block, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi – 110001 with "Comments on GAAR Committee" written on the envelope.
DSM/RS
24 July 2012
PIB on TDS Returns
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Filing of TDS statement with correct PAN and CIN/BIN is important because under Rule 37BA of Income Tax Rules, 1962 credit for tax deducted at source is given to the deductees on the basis of TDS statement furnished to the Income-tax Department by the deductor. Filing of TDS statements with incorrect PAN or other details of the deductee would, therefore, cause inconvenience to the deductees (taxpayer).
In case the income on which tax has been deducted at source is assessable in the hands of a person other than the deductee, the deductee must file a declaration with the deductor that credit for the TDS shall be given to the other person and not to the deductee. The declaration filed by the deductee must contain the name, address, Permanent Account Number of the person to whom credit is to be given and reasons for giving credit to such person. The deductor must, in the TDS statement, report the tax deduction in the name of such other person and also issue the TDS certificate in the name of the person in whose name credit is shown in the TDS statement.
TDS certificates for deductions on income other than salary income (Form 16A) for the quarter ending 30th June 2012 should be issued on or before 30th July 2012.
01 June 2012
Finance Act 2012
The Finance Bill, 2012 has been enacted and has become Finance Act,
2012 w.e.f. 28.05.2012 ( Act No 23 of 2012 ) with president's assent
and all statutory provisions has applicable w.e.f. 28.05.2012 except
the provisions of negative list which will be applicable after
issuance of the Notifications which are expected around June 1, 2012.
In all liklihood, the other provisions may be made applicable from
July 1, 2012.
FM on IT Retrospective Amendments
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Regarding the issue of Advisory Group relating to transfer pricing and International taxation, the Finance Minister has said that he has constituted an advisory group to resolve various issues in the area of transfer pricing and International taxation. The group has held its first meeting on 25th May 2012 and on advice of group and NASSCOM, the Finance Minister has approved issue of a circular to avoid multilevel TDS on software u/s194J.This will remove hardship in case of software distributors.
SS/SL
ODI Online
05 May 2012
Cost of Collection about 0.6%
31 March 2012
CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT DOUBLES TO $19.6 b in Q3
BOP: Experiencing Stress
02 March 2012
GDP Growth @ 6.1%
14 January 2012
FDI- Singe Brand
12 November 2011
PPF-NSC- CHANGES
AGENTS DISAPPOINTED
30 October 2011
National Manufacturing Policy
Government of India
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
The Cabinet in its meeting held on 15" September 2011 considered the National Manufacturing Policy and directed that the policy may be considered by a Group of Ministers (GOM) for further harmonizing the differences in some inter-ministerial positions notably relating to Ministry of Labour and Employment and the Ministry of Environment and Forests. The GOM in its meeting held on 14th October 2011 has resolved the relevant issues. A revised note incorporating the recommendations of the GOM has been approved by the Cabinet today.
The major objectives of the National Manufacturing Policy are to increase the sectoral share of manufacturing in GOP to at least 25% by 2022; to increase the rate of job creation so as to create 100 million additional jobs by 2022; and to enhance global competitiveness, domestic value addition, technological depth and environmental sustainability of growth.
The policy has been formulated after detailed consultations with the industry; subject matter experts; State Governments and the concerned Ministries/Departments of the Government of India. The policy envisages specific interventions broadly in the areas of industrial infrastructure development; improvement of the business environment through rationalization and simplification of business regulations; development of appropriate technologies especially green technologies for sustainable development and skill development of the younger population.
Industrial infrastructure development is envisaged not only generally but also through the creation of large integrated industrial townships called National Investment and Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs) with state-of-the-art infrastructure; land use on the basis of zoning; clean and energy efficient technologies; necessary social and institutional infrastructure in order to provide a productive environment to persons transitioning from the primary to the secondary and tertiary sectors. The land for these zones will preferably be waste infertile land not suitable for cultivation; not in the vicinity of any ecologically fragile area and with reasonable access to basic resources.
It is envisaged to ensure compliance of labour and environmental laws while introducing procedural simplifications and rationalization so that the regulatory burden on industry is reduced. The interventions proposed are generally sector neutral, location neutral and technology neutral except the attempt to incentivize green technology for sustainable development No subsidies are proposed for individual units or areas. The basic thrust is to provide an enabling environment for tapping the potential of the private sector and the entrepreneurial skills of the younger population.
The contribution of the manufacturing sector at just over 16% of India's GOP is much below its potential and a cause of concern especially in the context of other Asian countries in similar stages of development. This also has its socio-economic manifestations and prevents India from fully leveraging the opportunities of globalization. India is a young country with over 60% of its population in the working age group. With over 220 million people estimated to join the work force in the next decade, the manufacturing sector will have to create gainful employment for at least half this number. With a view to accelerating the growth of the manufacturing sector, the manufacturing policy proposes to create an enabling environment suitable for the sector to flourish in India.
AD/SC/SK/LM
08 September 2011
PPF Deposit Limit Increased
10 August 2011
IndianCAs: Country Sovereign Ratings - RMF
http://www.facebook.com/?filter=app_2361831622#!/group.php?gid=144654990478&ref=nf
***************************************************************************
Please visit the blog of IndianCAs and Express yourself by writing your comments by clicking on the link below:
http://indiancas.blogspot.com/
***************************************************************************
Hi! I have created an sms group for the benefit of members of IndianCAs. I will be sending regular updates, good quotes.If you wish to subscribe to this group, send following sms to 9870807070
ON IndianCAs
You will receive an sms from group. Just reply the message by writing:
Agree
And you will be the member of my SMS group IndianCAs.You can unsubscribe at any point of time by sendin an sms Off IndianCAs. There is no charge for receiving sms. So let's Go Mobile.
*************************************************************************
Note: All messages posted by members including me on this group are sent in their personal capacity. No official position held anywhere by them have nothing to do with this email group. The group does not accept any responsibility with regards to accuracy or the mistakes in the material circulated on this group. Please confirm from your independent source before using the information or material posted on this group.
*************************************************************************
Further, your attention is invited:
The messages on this group are approved only when the moderator finds it of immense importance to the members at general, otherwise, this group is not used for discussion or as discussion forum.
12 May 2011
FDI in LLP Approved
APPROVAL FOR FDI IN LLP FIRMS
Approval for FDI in Limited Liability Partnership firms
PRESS RELEASE, DATED 11-5-2011
The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs today approved the proposal to amend the policy on allowing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) firms.
The FDI in LLPs will be implemented in a calibrated manner, beginning with the 'open' sectors where monitoring is not required, subject to the following conditions :
(a) LLPs with FDI will be allowed, through the Government approval route, in those sectors/activities where 100% FDI is allowed, through the automatic route and there are no FDI-linked performance related conditions.
(b) LLPs with FDI will not be allowed to operate in agricultural/plantation activity, print media or real estate business.
(c) LLPs with FDI will not be eligible to make any downstream investments.
There are also further following conditions relating to funding, ownership and management of LLPs :
I. Funding of LLPs:
(a) An Indian company, having FDI, will be permitted to make downstream investment in LLPs only if both the company, as well as the LLP are operating in sectors where 100% FDI is allowed, through the automatic route and there are no FDI-linked performance related conditions.
(b) Foreign Capital participation in the capital structure of the LLPs will be allowed only by way of cash considerations, received by inward remittance, through normal banking channels, or by debit to NRE/FCNR account of the person concerned, maintained with an authorized dealer/authorized bank; and
(c) Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) and Foreign Venture Capital Investors (FVCIs) will not be permitted to invest in LLPs. LLPs will also not be permitted to avail External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs.)
II. Ownership and management of LLPs :
(a) For the purpose of determination of the designated partners in respect of LLPs with FDI, the term "resident in India" would have the meaning, as defined for "person resident in India", under section 2(v)(i)(A) & (B) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 ;
(b) In case the LLP has a body corporate as a designated partner, the body corporate should only be a company registered under the Companies Act and not any other body, such as an LLP or a trust.
III. Conversion of a company with FDI into an LLP will be allowed only if the above stipulations are met and with the prior approval of FIPB/Government.
IV. The designated partners will be responsible for compliance with the above conditions and liable for all penalties imposed on the LLP for their contravention.
Presently, FDI is allowed in Indian companies. It is allowed in a firm or a proprietary concern, subject to certain conditions. FDI in a trust is also allowed with prior Government approval, provided it is a Venture Capital Fund (VCF).
The CCEA's approval will benefit the Indian economy by attracting greater FDI, creating employment and bringing in international best practices and latest technologies in the country.
The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (LLP Act) was notified in April, 2009. With the passage of this Act, a new hybrid entity, incorporating the features of a body corporate and a partnership, can now be formed for the purpose of undertaking business in India.
29 August 2010
Enhancing microfinance -K. V. RAMANAND
Microfinance institutions need to be permitted to operate as a business or an industry with an objective to make profits and grow.
Currently, over Rs 20,000 crore is channelled by private sector MFIs amongst around 28 million borrowers.
"Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, you feed him for a lifetime," goes the Chinese saying. Microfinance is hailed by many as the panacea to alter the social fabric of rural India.
The depressing levels of poverty, particularly in rural India, motivated policymakers (such as the RBI and the Registrar of Cooperative Societies) to embark on the Self-Help Group (SHG), bank linkage programme to channelise the much-needed capital to the remotest parts of the country with the hallowed twin objectives of social and economic uplift.
SIDBI and NABARD, leading Indian financial institutions, played a stellar role by lending directly. They also paved the way for extensive private sector participation in this industry by funding private sector players.
The emergence of the concept of microfinance and private sector institutions was primarily to supplement and enhance the outreach of the traditional banking sector through the length and breadth of the country.
The benign objective was to protect the poor from the usury they were subjected to from unorganised moneylenders. Microfinance industry operates on the fundamental concept of small loans disbursed amongst a group of close knit people and subtly leverages on social and peer pressure to ensure full and timely repayment.
This industry has an envious record of loan recovery (almost 97 per cent). More importantly, the sector also seems largely immune to the global financial turmoil as it tends to operate on a regional basis. Therefore, it is highly susceptible however, to the regional issues and trends.
Organised phenomenon
What started as a local initiative by a few dedicated individuals with a social/community objective to mobilise and channel local resources has become a parallel organised banking phenomenon.
The style under which the entities operate ranges from for profit corporate entities such as NBFCs (non-banking finance companies to Section 25 companies and societies and trusts. Even the spectrum of regulators is widespread and ranges from the RBI to the Registrar of Cooperatives.
For long, this sector depended on the traditional sources of borrowed capital. There were many restrictions on free access to capital.
Public deposits were not available based on the nature of the entity and sources were primarily from the community and grants. Priority sector norms enabled microfinance institutions (MFIs) access to bank funds. Currently, over Rs 20,000 crore is channelled by private sector MFIs amongst around 28 million borrowers.
Lately, this sector has attracted funds from global development financial institutions and, more importantly, the global private equity funds. Private equity players have invested approximately $300 million in this sector in about 25 transactions since 2006.
This availability of capital in turn saw many socially-oriented entrepreneurs launching MFIs of their own. In all, over 3000 MFIs operate currently in India. This led many to draw comparisons between the credit-card boom for the middle class and the poor man's credit mechanism, the microfinance industry.
Key concerns
This rapid growth has led to many concerns being raised, primarily around the usage of funds by the borrowers and the rates charged by the lenders. In many cases, the lending rates range from an effective 25 per cent per annum to 32 per cent per annum.
Concerns were raised by activists whether this mechanism was fuelling rural consumerism by encouraging "unnecessary" spending by making credit easily available.
Is the credit being used for "productive" purposes? Is the credit going for measures that alleviate the impoverished status of the borrowers or is it meeting their short term consumption requirements? Other serious considerations are with regard to the systems and processes at the lending institutions to monitor and control disbursements and collections.
The MFIs have a requirement to strengthen their internal process and corporate governance standards. This is mandated by the rapid growth of the industry and also the need to operate from discrete and remote locations.
Considering the widespread presence of operations, many a times in remote areas with minimal access to communication networks, there is serious inherent risk in operations. Technology, therefore, will be a great enabler and can play an important role in the stability and growth of this industry by minimising risks and also significantly reducing costs.
We believe that the microfinance industry is a path breaking tool in achieving the stated twin objectives. The best and the most effective way of reaching there is by a judicious mix of active private sector participation with a calibrated approach of support and regulation by the Government and its agencies.
MFIs need to be permitted to operate as a business or an industry with an objective to make profits and grow. The regulatory set-up should be focused on prevention of any frauds or scams considering the high growth this sector is witnessing. The long-term growth of this industry is ensured if the MFIs practise self-regulation and direct the funds for productive purposes at a healthy margin without just being focused on growing the business by maximising (not optimising) disbursals at the highest possible rates of interest.
Sharing of information about borrowers and their payment track record/defaults will go a long way in preventing sizeable write-offs. This will also prevent multiple borrowings by the same borrower from multiple entities. In some instances, the new borrowings were apparently to service the old ones.
Regulatory supervision
The Government and other regulators should enable the MFIs to operate in an unhindered manner but with a clear and strict oversight. There has been a lot of debate about the need to regulate the interest rates on microfinance loans. The best that the regulators can do is to encourage this sector that enables multiple players to enter and participate aggressively, thereby increasing competition and the enhancing the need for efficiencies to survive and grow.
In a very positive development, leading players in this industry have come forward to set up a Microfinance Institutions Network (Mfin) that will interact on behalf of the industry with the regulators to ensure sustainable growth of the industry. It hopes to enhance information sharing amongst the members about the regulations, operational benchmarks and also borrower profiles and, more importantly, act as a self-regulating initiative.
While corporate diktats suggest a full-blown stress on growth and profits, the nature of the industry and the target segment it caters to position the players uniquely with the need for socioeconomic consciousness. This is a challenge for the captains of the entities that operate in this segment. However, we can be certain of one thing here — like some of the events that transformed the country, like the IT revolution, the concept of microfinance is destined to make a significant difference to the populace.
(The author is Executive Director, Corporate Finance, KPMG)27 August 2010
Transformation in lease classification -MOHAN R. LAVI
The proposed amendments consider a 'right-of-use' model where both lessees and lessors record assets and liabilities arising from lease contracts.
Classification of leases into operating and financial leases has not been very ambiguous, with clear rules for sometime now. But this is proposed to be radically altered by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), considering its revised Exposure Draft on International Accounting Standard 17 — Accounting for Leases.
Normally, a finance lease is one where the lease term exceeds the life of the asset, there is a transfer of title at the end of the lease term, an option to purchase the asset is built into the agreement or the present value of lease payments exceed a substantial portion of the fair market value of the asset.
Operating lease has been negatively defined — that is, one that is not a finance lease. It has been estimated that $640 billion of lease commitments do not appear on the balance-sheets of companies (as they are classified as operating leases and expensed), resulting in unclear financial leverage and gearing ratios.
Lessee
The proposed amendments consider a 'right-of-use' accounting model where both lessees and lessors record assets and liabilities arising from lease contracts. The assets and liabilities are recorded at the present value of the lease payments. They are subsequently measured using a cost-based method.
A lessee has acquired a right to use the underlying asset, and it pays for that right with the lease payments. A lessee would record: an asset for its right to use the underlying asset (the right-of-use asset), and a liability to pay rentals (liability for lease payments). The right-of-use asset would originally be recorded at the present value of the lease payments. It would then be amortised over the life of the lease and tested for impairment. A lessee (under IFRS) could revalue its right-of-use assets. The right-of-use asset would be presented within the property, plant and equipment category on the balance-sheet but separately from assets that the lessee owns.
Lessor
The accounting would reflect the exposure of the lessor to the risks or benefits of the underlying asset. When the lease transfers significant risks or benefits of the underlying asset to the lessee, the lessor would apply the de-recognition approach. When the lessor retains exposure to significant risks or benefits of the underlying asset the lessor would apply the performance obligation approach. The de-recognition approach requires the lessor to take part of the underlying asset off its balance-sheet (derecognise it) and record a right to receive lease payments. It is possible that a lessor could record a gain on commencement of the lease under this approach.
The performance obligation approach requires the lessor to keep the underlying asset on its balance-sheet and to record a right to receive lease payments and a liability to permit the lessee to use the underlying asset (a lease liability).
The lessor records income over the expected life of the lease. Many lease contracts include variable features.
For example, leases often include options to renew or terminate the lease, contingent rentals (for example, rentals that vary depending on sales) or residual value guarantees. The proposals would require lessees and lessors to determine the assets and liabilities on the basis of the longest possible lease term that is more likely than not to occur. Lessees would always include contingent rentals but lessors would only include contingent rentals that they can measure reliably. Lessees and lessors must also include estimates of residual value guarantees. Including these items informs investors about expected cash flows. Current requirements generally exclude such items, making it more difficult for investors to estimate future cash flows. The proposed amendments would entail a revision to Indian Accounting Standard 19 on Leases since both differ conceptually. The frequent issue of revised standards by the IASB is forcing the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to keep pace. The ICAI is mulling whether to move over to the brand-new IFRS- 9 (Part 1 of 4 of which is now out) or to go ahead with IAS 39 on Financial Instruments from next year. A standard on financial instruments being extremely important, it would probably be better to implement IAS 39 and assess the impact instead of going in for a half-baked IFRS-9. The only constant in the accounting world these days is change. (The author is a Bangalore-based chartered accountant.)
19 August 2010
On markets and scams -D. MURALI
India's political and social structures have preserved entrepreneurs, if not exactly cut them loose, observes Raghav Bahl in Superpower? ( www.penguinbooksindia.com). Even as the state invested in big-ticket capital assets in the early decades after Independence, land continued to stay in private hands, he reasons in the chapter titled 'Entrepreneurs, consumers and English speakers'.
"India's sprawling rural economy has always been entirely 'capitalist' in its orientation. Even the urban economy allowed private enterprise to grow under a somewhat draconian regime of licences and approvals… The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) is among the oldest in Asia. Capital and credit have always been available, albeit for a 'price,' for private enterprise."
Harshad Mehta episode
Of interest to finance professionals is a section in the chapter, captioned 'the story of two stock markets,' opening with how Harshad Mehta, who, in his late thirties, 'pulled off a stock market scam in India which would have put Bernie Madoff to shame.' The year was 1992 and there was much excitement around a freshly minted, rapidly privatising economy, the author narrates.
"It was easy to spin get-rich-quick stories in an unregulated casino. For a man who had barely scraped through his accounting studies at college, Harshad Mehta was a deadly combination — a legendary crook and a master storyteller. He siphoned off a billion dollars from several Indian banks to rig the stock prices of ninety blue chips."
As some of you may recall, 'stocks doubled, trebled, quadrupled, and Mehta became the cult deity of wealth.' But his house of cards collapsed when the bubble burst. "He died in custody on the last day of 2001 as India's biggest defaulter, owing nearly $170 million to several banks. He also left behind an unsolved mystery of 2.7 million missing shares and seventy-two cases of conspiracy, cheating, and fraud."
Shock therapy
Looking back, Bahl says that the Mehta scam was a shock therapy for India's stock markets. Although over a century old, the BSE — set up under a banyan tree in 1875 — was little more than a privileged brokers' club in the early 1990s, he reminisces.
"It traded for barely a couple of hours every day on the outcry method. Shares were held in physical form, and trades were squared off once in fifteen days. Upcountry brokers were forced to transact on a rickety phone network. Companies could cancel share transfers on the flimsiest of excuses, like signatures not matching or papers lost in transit." As a result, the system was prone to delay, abuse, price fixing, insider trading and frequent breakdowns, informs the author.
Jolted by the scam, the government set up a tough securities regulator, but wealthy brokers continued to defy it, one learns. The breakthrough came in the form of NSE (National Stock Exchange), a digitally savvy exchange with equity put up by government financial institutions. The 'game changer,' which began trading in 1994, allowed the same equity instrument to be traded on both exchanges in the same city and across similar trading hours, and banked on dematerialised shares and electronic depositories.
"Over ten thousand terminals in over 400 cities gave instant trading access to members. In eleven months flat, the new exchange logged up higher trading volumes than its 120-year-old competitor. The transaction settlement period dropped from fifteen to two days. To survive, BSE had to set up its own electronic system." Bahl is proud that today the Indian stock market is among the largest in the world, next only to NYSE in terms of the number of shares listed, deals transacted and the size of retail investor participation.
Stock exchanges in China
What has been the story in China, where stock exchanges took birth around the same time that we were reinventing ours? The aim of the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE) set up in December 1990, and the Shenzen Stock Exchange (SZSE), set up in April 1991, was to sell shares of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), but 'an inexperienced China opted for a very complex system,' recounts the author.
Sample this, from his description: The same company could not list on both exchanges — it had to choose one. Five different types of shares could be issued: A-shares (sold in local Chinese currency to local individuals); B-shares (sold in either US or Hong Kong dollars to foreign investors); C-shares (issued to Chinese state institutions or departments, but tradable only 'over the counter' in institution-to-institution sales, rather than on the main exchanges); H-shares (equity issued by mainland companies on the Hong Kong stock exchange); N-shares (issued on the NYSE); and 'a sixth — and the strangest — category was 'non-tradable' shares held by the government or its agencies.'
Silos in markets
So, the majority of shares in early listed companies were not floated, with only the shares sold to the general public being tradable, and thus making for very thin volumes and huge price volatility, explains Bahl. Since China wanted to keep a tight control on its currency and foreign capital flows, it was forced to create these silos to isolate each currency, geography and class of investor, he notes.
"The early years were wracked by a dizzy gyration in stock prices… Contributing to the messy situation was a 'quota system' for selecting SOEs to float their shares; each province was given a fixed quota of companies they could bring to the market." What suffered was the quality of paper floated as an effect of 'the shadow of politics' or 'the unseen hand of political patronage,' which explains the non-failure of any initial float, and non-delisting of any publicly listed company.
'Grey' transactions
Such a fragmented structure created frictions at each margin, besides creating a playground for 'grey' transactions that illegally moved capital across prohibited boundaries to profit from price differences, finds Bahl. "A company with A, B and H shares today has three wholly different valuations; often, A-shares have traded at three times the value of B-shares or H-shares, puzzling investors."
He points out that while common sense dictates that B-shares should command a premium, as foreign investors have superior access to information and analytical skills, that is not the case, perhaps due to 'a speculative frenzy in China's domestic stock market that has taken A-shares to 'bubble' levels.'
The book cites Morgan Stanley's statistics that a third of reported corporate earnings in China in 2007 came from speculative gains in stock markets.
"For instance, the apparel company Youngor had earned nearly 99 per cent of its profits from subscribing to shares of China Life, Bank of Ningbo and Citic Securities. Although some norms have been tightened, banks in China have lent freely at very low rates to help companies build up their investment portfolios."
Five more crises
To those who dismiss the Indian bourses as unhealthy, post Harshad Mehta's scam in the early 1990s, it may come as a surprise that Indian markets have weathered five crises since then, as Bahl chronicles.
In 1995, the BSE was closed for three days after payment problems on a company which had crashed, he begins. "In 1997, a mutual fund closed shop after defrauding investors; in 1998, the president of the BSE was sacked for allowing prices of three companies to be manipulated; in 2001, another price-rigging scandal by another ambitious broker was busted; and finally, in 2005, thousands of fake accounts were unearthed, that were getting illegal allotments of newly floated shares under the quota reserved for individual investors." Stating that wherever there is a stock market, there will be a scam, Bahl avers that since 2005 no major scandal has erupted in India's stock markets.
What is the scene in China? It is still in the throes of a learning curve, grappling with frequent scams in its still maturing stock markets, he feels. An example cited in the book the November 2009 arrest of 39-year-old Huang Guangyu, the chairman of Gome Electrical Appliances, the country's biggest electronics retailer.
"Forbes had listed Huang as China's second wealthiest individual, estimating his worth at $2.7 billion. Caijing reported that Huang was detained for an alleged stock manipulation case involving a company controlled by his elder brother. He was eventually fined $120 million and handed a fourteen-year jail term…"
Engaging comparison of two countries, in crisply-written chapters.
03 April 2010
Consolidated FDI Policy [1 Attachment]
Consolidated FDI Policy effective from 1st APril,2010- see attachment |
Attachment(s) from Ashwin Nagar
1 of 1 File(s)
05 December 2009
IndianCAs: Dubai real estate facts
FORTY years earlier Dubai was a village on the edge of the Arabian Desert. Locals citizens lived in houses made out of mud shacks and the only vehicle for travel or moving was `The Ship of The Desert'.
After 40 years Dubai have created artificial islands full of luxury villas, the world's tallest tower, an underwater hotel and many more things which might make tails spin of one's eyes. Dubai is now the glittering crown of the Middle East. The gulf state is now being known for its tall skyscrapers, wall-to-wall shopping centers and luxury hotels.
But the whole glittering castle is of the boom in real estate was constructed on sand. Sand made of credit/borrowed money. But the leash of bubble got broken when the financial crisis broke off sending the prices of real estate to rock bottom levels.
Now prices in the real estate sector crashed where prices have fallen by up to 60%.
400 construction projects worth more than $300 billion have been shut down or postponed. The project cancelaation reveals demand havedried up and future outlook is also very bleak.
Even after the world economy tried to come out of the dark woods of recession the Dubai real estate sector struggles to survive. They are finding hard to find buyers even after prices came down by 60%.
Moreover the cost of living in Dubai has gone up like any thing.
All these will add the unemployment in Dubai. Most of the Asians are placed their and they might come back as Dubai have less to offer now and cost of living have goes up.
Foreigners have refused to buy the projects which have resulted further trap for inventory creation. This has resulted to default of payments of debt.
The fear in Western markets is that banks risk losing billions, which will damage their lending process and recovery of the economy too. Dubai World has a net exposure of debt of $59 billion of liabilities as of August. Where as the total debt of Dubai is $80 billion. So the Dubai World holds debt of 73.75% of Dubai's total debt. The Dubai Government announced that it is restructuring Dubai World, an investment company owned by the government, with immediate effect. It has asked creditors for a six-month standstill on its obligations until at least 30 May 2010. Nakheel, a real estate subsidiary of Dubai World, has a convertible bond due next months
The most of the fear of UK and US is that Dubai might go for sell of assets which they are holding in UK and US. If this breaks out then one might find cascading fall in the world equities.
The fall in the share prices of banks eroded £14 billion from the UK alone. As per Credit Suisse European banks could have an exposure of €40 billion (£36 billion) as loans to Dubai. Banks including HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland have helped to finance Dubai's acquisitions and are now on the hook if the state cannot repay its debts.
ON IndianCAs
You will receive an sms from group. Just reply the message by writing:
Agree
And you will be the member of my SMS group IndianCAs.You can unsubscribe at any point of time by sendin an sms Off IndianCAs. There is no charge for receiving sms. So let's Go Mobile.
*************************************************************************
Please visit the blog of IndianCAs and Express yourself by writing your comments by clicking on the link below:
http://indiancas.blogspot.com/
*************************************************************************
Note: All messages posted by members including me on this group are sent in their personal capacity. No official position held anywhere by them have nothing to do with this email group. The group does not accept any responsibility with regards to accuracy or the mistakes in the material circulated on this group. Please confirm from your independent source before using the information or material posted on this group.
*************************************************************************
Further, your attention is invited:
The messages on this group are approved only when the moderator finds it of immense importance to the members at general, otherwise, this group is not used for discussion or as discussion forum.
Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors
Empanelment of Concurrent Auditors / Revenue Auditors for Bank of Maharashtra. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA invites applications from practicing firm...
-
After the ICAI regional council and central council elections , there is an anxious waiting period for resul...
-
Drafts of tax accounting standard on construction contracts, government grants issued The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has invited c...
-
Here is the final list of candidates won from WIRC for Central Council: Sr. No. Name of Candidate 1 CA. Adukia Rajkumar Satyanarayan 2 CA...